I talked about how these finals and perhaps the Mem Cup will affect his rankings. The kid is smallish but he seems to have the type of build that tends to be very durable.No one talks Benson , not saying a #5 pick
I talked about how these finals and perhaps the Mem Cup will affect his rankings. The kid is smallish but he seems to have the type of build that tends to be very durable.No one talks Benson , not saying a #5 pick
Well we aren't going to get one with out being extremely fortuitous. Somehow I doubt Michkov will be that player.I agree with you, but I think his overall point still stands. We're starving for a superstar forward. It's crazy to think anyone who was born post 1980 has never seen a 100 points player with the Habs.
Well we aren't going to get one with out being extremely fortuitous. Somehow I doubt Michkov will be that player.
After Bedard, Michkov has the highest chance of becoming a superstar / generational talent than anyone else in the draft. He's up there with Bedard. Always has been. Nothing has changed.Well we aren't going to get one with out being extremely fortuitous. Somehow I doubt Michkov will be that player.
Info came out that Wright didn't impress the brass on his interview, that they liked Slaf, that they interviewed Slaf during the day of draft. Also Hughes wanting to build a team on size and skill.
If by then you thought Wright or Cooley had a chance, let me sell you my bottled fart.
What is the difference with the most probable scenario, as of today?The dream scenario is if Anaheim takes Carlsson, and Columbus somehow prefers Smith to Fantilli.
Then San Jose picks Fantilli and we have Michkov on our hands.
That isn't what I'm talking about. I doubt we are selecting him.After Bedard, Michkov has the highest chance of becoming a superstar / generational talent than anyone else in the draft. He's up there with Bedard. Always has been. Nothing has changed.
He may be available but I don't believe we will pick him no matter what the hue and cry is.What do you mean? That he will not be a 100 pts player, or that he won't be available?
Yea no, thats not how the events unfolded. All the stuffs regarding Wright not impressing teams in the interviews came after the draft. Before the draft, Hughes said he was impressed by Wright's interview.
Hughes said he liked all 3 of Wright, Slaf, and Cooley, and that they were going to pick one of them. Slaf wasn't singled out.
They interviewed Slaf during draft day? Yes, it was postponed from a previous day due to a flight delay. The habs management didn't even bother having dinner with Slaf, whereas they had a dinner with Wright and with Cooley.
Build a team based on size and skill? Wright is 6'1 and was seen as a highly skilled player.
And didn't Wight have meetings with several of the Habs brass at different times? I assumed they asked several employees to meet with him because they didn't like something about the initial interview. And Hughes is not going to say anyting negative about the interview. He might in a few years if it becomes obvious Wright has an attitude problem.They did also meet Slaf at the combine (other than the 15 minutes interview they do with many more prospects)
but the reason they didn’t bring him to dinner at the combine is because they already met him the week of the world championship and had a long talk with him there.
Maybe not an attitude problem but maybe they saw he wouldn’t develop well here if they thought he wasn’t build for high pressure and constant eyes on him.And didn't Wight have meetings with several of the Habs brass at different times? I assumed they asked several employees to meet with him because they didn't like something about the initial interview. And Hughes is not going to say anyting negative about the interview. He might in a few years if it becomes obvious Wright has an attitude problem.
He may be available but I don't believe we will pick him no matter what the hue and cry is.
What is the difference with the most probable scenario, as of today?
Ana takes Fantilli, Clb takes Smith, SJ takes Carlssonn. and Habs take Michkov.
In both scenarios, Habs get Michkov.
Why?
Fantilli dominated the NCAA as a rookie 17-18 years old and IMO has a higher potential, more high-end skills.
Watched a bit of Hutson, Fantili and Farrell this year.
Also, I really like his personality. Think he will be a good room player wherever he goes.
Montreal Hockey Now journalist Marco D'Amico revealed
According to a source in the organization, these two attackers would have greatly attracted the eye of the leaders and the CH would seriously consider acquiring one of these two players with their choice of 5th overall:
“I spoke to a few privileged members of the Montreal Canadiens who spoke with great enthusiasm about Ryan Leonard and Will Smith during the U-18s,” said the source, who asked to remain anonymous.
“They were waiting to see if Leonard was going to take his game up a notch, and he did. He's a player to watch, who's on Montreal's radar, should Smith leave early. »
Yea no, thats not how the events unfolded. All the stuffs regarding Wright not impressing teams in the interviews came after the draft. Before the draft, Hughes said he was impressed by Wright's interview.
Hughes said he liked all 3 of Wright, Slaf, and Cooley, and that they were going to pick one of them. Slaf wasn't singled out.
They interviewed Slaf during draft day? Yes, it was postponed from a previous day due to a flight delay. The habs management didn't even bother having dinner with Slaf, whereas they had a dinner with Wright and with Cooley.
Build a team based on size and skill? Wright is 6'1 and was seen as a highly skilled player.
They did also meet Slaf at the combine (other than the 15 minutes interview they do with many more prospects)
but the reason they didn’t bring him to dinner at the combine is because they already met him the week of the world championship and had a long talk with him there.
f***ing Christ, what a f***ing nightmare
Nothing against these players, of course.
But f*** management if they do this with Michkov on board
Only when I agree with something he writes so this is a very rare thing.Jack Todd still gets quoted?!?![]()
If Molson gives them a no-draft on Michkov for whatever reasons, they won't be allowed to say it out loud e.g. it will be very hard to deduce if they felt he wasn't BPA or if they wanted to draft him but got a no from ownership.
There's very little chance Carlsson will ever be worth as much as Michkov + Slafkofvsky in a few years. Let alone Michkov + Slaf + Simashev/Morin/Stenberg + Hrabal.
GM should get fired if he says yes to that trade.
I still think most probable is:
BEDARD
FANTILLI
CARLSSON
MICHKOV
SMITH
But it will be interesting to hear more news about what San Jose will or might do, like we heard Columbus will take center
After looking at it i think for Columbus a guy like Smith would make more sense, Smith is american and just 2 hours away. For development purposes Smith is the best option for them.
SJ, Michkov
So we might get super lucky and land on Carlsson afterall.
Molson won't do any such thing.Of course he's gonna say that before the draft and it's true that he's a "serious" youg man. What was reported as the issue is that when confronted with flaws in his game (like all prospects) he was very defensive and (allegedly) not really self-aware.
Personnally I was rooting for Cooley but after seeing a few interviews of him I was wondering how he would handle the media spotlight in MTL.
Craig Ramsey (Slovakia coach at Olympics & former assistant coach with Ligthning when MSL played there) mentionned in a video interview that he had discussions with Habs brass on Slaf (and the other Slovaks) e.g. the intelligence gathering didn't start at the Combine.
If Molson gives them a no-draft on Michkov for whatever reasons, they won't be allowed to say it out loud e.g. it will be very hard to deduce if they felt he wasn't BPA or if they wanted to draft him but got a no from ownership.