BalticWarrior
Registered User
I know but guys like Karlsson, Hedman etc. are one of the best. Should've said one of the better.
Sure,thats fair they are definitley 2nd best,right after Canada.
I know but guys like Karlsson, Hedman etc. are one of the best. Should've said one of the better.
Sure,thats fair they are definitley 2nd best,right after Canada.
Actually lots of have them as the best D in the world. So it's not a weird statement by any means. I mean both CBS and the NHL networkd had Sweden as #1 in front of Canada.
Sweden's defence is better, but it won't matter as Canada has better forwards than all the other teams along with elite goaltending. Canada is elite in all positions while Sweden's forwards are iffy (relative to Canada) after top-6.
Canada to me, some of the Swedish D are being overrated.
Canada to me, some of the Swedish D are being overrated.
Canadas D is the overrated one to me. No subban and letang.
Price doesn't have any advantage over Lundqvist. It's more of the opposite considering Price hasn't played hockey for a year. As for the defense, I give a slight advantage to Sweden, certainly when guys like Keith, Letang and Subban aren't playing. By forwards Canada definitely has the advantage, but the Swedish forward composition with excellent two-way forwards helps to cover the gap a bit.Price is in goal. This ends the argument in Canada's favour
Price doesn't have any advantage over Lundqvist. It's more of the opposite considering Price hasn't played hockey for a year.
And Price is becoming the new DiPietro. Happy now?The King is close to retiring and starting his fashion career
Canada to me, some of the Swedish D are being overrated.
I think it would be a better discussion if Canada actually had Keith.