what exactly did they say?
Kessel wouldn't be on it anyway...he's hurt.
Ryan wouldn't be much of a difference maker.
So, a sample size of 40 minutes isn't fair to judge Schneider for the tournament, but a sample size of 50 minutes is good to judge Quick's entire reputation? Ok...
And I'm not counting the other games this tournament because he was great. Do tell me what horrible things he did wrong the other night in letting in goals on a 2-on-1, 2-on-0, and a screened deflection, hmmm?
Oh absolutely. Not a doubt in my mind.
how illogical is it, to say you're building a team to beat Canada, and not take the best possible talent? how ****ing stupid are you if you think you can beat them that way?
Yeah they trashed the Olympic village
No they couldn't. No matter how much fans think they know...they never know better than people who have been working in the game for decades. This team is poorly coached and/or not listening to Torts but roster changes would not have mattered.
No they couldn't. No matter how much fans think they know...they never know better than people who have been working in the game for decades. This team is poorly coached and/or not listening to Torts but roster changes would not have mattered.
Their championship effort? Ugly
i am fairly sure hfboards could have built a better team than USA hockey did
Hang on, I was only half paying attention - did Leah Hextall just say something about being "pissed off" in a question to Parise?
Did they have a salary cap to be under idk it really is baffling![]()
Where the hell is Kessel? He would have been the top scorer on the US team
That really helped him didn't it? He **** the bed against Canada and the staff went with the guy who had a .970% and gave up one goal on 33 shots. Who was the logical choice to go with for this game?You mean the guy with the highest save% in NHL history?