Calling it Now: Tampa is a Serious Threat Again, Nashville has Screwed Themselves, and These facts are not Unrelated

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.

Armourboy

Hey! You suck!
Jan 20, 2014
20,543
12,198
Shelbyville, TN
Cap space.
And he ain't that great to start with. Parssinen could more than fill his spot but Brunette won't play him.

As much as people point to the contracts our bigger issue is the coaching staff. Stamkos some nights is getting more time than Forsberg. He hasn't tried to adjust anything other than to shuffle lines, which he seems to change every shift. He plays his young guys 7 minutes a night while shuffling who they play with.

Right now Brunette has this team playing to its weaknesses rather than its strength
 

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
22,015
10,393
Never criticized the GM. Zito is fantastic. Tampa has great management too - Just said letting Stammer go was obvious and not some smooth brain GM work.

Said Florida teams have a competitive advantage in free agency. It's a fact I'm really done with your straw man nonsense about it.
It's actually really difficult and most teams fall into the trap of holding onto their declining star players too long because of emotional attachment. What they did was the right move, but it's rare.
 

Laus723

Graceful brutality
Sponsor
Jan 27, 2006
32,159
7,079
Wellington, FL
And he ain't that great to start with. Parssinen could more than fill his spot but Brunette won't play him.

As much as people point to the contracts our bigger issue is the coaching staff. Stamkos some nights is getting more time than Forsberg. He hasn't tried to adjust anything other than to shuffle lines, which he seems to change every shift. He plays his young guys 7 minutes a night while shuffling who they play with.

Right now Brunette has this team playing to its weaknesses rather than its strength
He’s a good coach, but we’d still be out in the early rounds if he was allowed to stay on. He has a ways to go, hopefully Nashvilles additions figure out how to mesh and go on a run.
Never criticized the GM. Zito is fantastic. Tampa has great management too - Just said letting Stammer go was obvious and not some smooth brain GM work.

Said Florida teams have a competitive advantage in free agency. It's a fact I'm really done with your straw man nonsense about it.
“Straw man,” what exactly was straw man that I said? Straw man is everyone pointing to the “no tax” (I pay plenty of f***ing taxes btw) and ignoring everything else I said. You still haven’t answered where it helped us or Tampa the majority of our existences. No one else can either.
I can't think of a recent-ish case of Tampa overholding onto a declining player. It must be a strong part of their success over the last decade.
With McDonough they seem to have imped the gun and circled back. It’s a fine line.
 

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,743
8,547
He’s a good coach, but we’d still be out in the early rounds if he was allowed to stay on. He has a ways to go, hopefully Nashvilles additions figure out how to mesh and go on a run.

“Straw man,” what exactly was straw man that I said? Straw man is everyone pointing to the “no tax” (I pay plenty of f***ing taxes btw) and ignoring everything else I said. You still haven’t answered where it helped us or Tampa the majority of our existences. No one else can either.


With McDonough they seem to have imped the gun and circled back. It’s a fine line.
This isn't the defence you think it is.

Showing that your two franchises were so incompetent that they couldn't utilize a competitive advantage isn't the flex you think it is.

Also, the cap didn't exist until 2005.

Also, the flat cap really made this effect exponentially stronger.

So there are a great number of ways to point out what a ridiculous competitive advantage it is.

Now, none of this means that the Panthers and Lightning haven't been managed well to take advantage of these benefits. But acting like they're not extremely prominent is just delusional.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Laus723

Laus723

Graceful brutality
Sponsor
Jan 27, 2006
32,159
7,079
Wellington, FL
This isn't the defence you think it is.

Showing that your two franchises were so incompetent that they couldn't utilize a competitive advantage isn't the flex you think it is.

Also, the cap didn't exist until 2005.

Also, the flat cap really made this effect exponentially stronger.

So there are a great number of ways to point out what a ridiculous competitive advantage it is.

Now, none of this means that the Panthers and Lightning haven't been managed well to take advantage of these benefits. But acting like they're not extremely prominent is just delusional.
I love the whining. The entire point is that it takes great players, a great GM, owners willing to spend to the cap, and players willing to “be paid less.” Totally agree it shows the incompetence, we had one of the worst owners in sports who set internal caps, made players pay for their game worns, and expected a casino to be built on adjacent land that would pay for the shortcomings he created.

I mean, what’s the frustration? That we’ve been able to keep players who’ve played well here but didn’t do well in other places, or that we have a staff great enough to find these guys in the first place, that we’re now a destination most guys don’t want to leave, or that your team is so incompetent they can’t do the same?

Plenty thought we’d struggle after losing Montour, OEL, our whole 4th line, and Stolarz. Just like they thought we’d struggle to start last year with the injuries we had. Zito’s an elite GM. He’s done an incredible job turning over the roster and creating a top team. The only guys still here since he came in are Barkov, Bob, and Ek.

The delusion is fans like you thinking the “competitive advantage” is what brought us the Cup and kept us competitive. Not many GMs would move a 115 point Huberdeau, a top pair d-man, a first, and a prospect for Tkachuk AND lock him in long term. That was balls and he was roasted for it AND moving off of Brunette after a great offensive season. Those moves pushed us over the edge. But, keep thinking it’s just taxes.

Tampa’s had their own struggles with retaining guys or not fully taking advantage of being a no tax team. See: Sergachev, Stamkos, etc. Other similarities to the Panthers: an incredible owner, great roster building, players who’ve fit well, a staff who found kucherov in the round they did.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Idiot Stick

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,743
8,547
I can't speak to the argument you're having with others, but against me it seems like you're having a zero-sum debate with yourself.

I'm certainly not suggesting that the only difference between Florida and Columbus is a tax advantage.

But to suggest that paying just about every prominent player somewhere between 1-3 million dollars less in a hard capped league isn't a MASSIVE advantage is absolutely bananas.

Again, the only cups that matter are the ones that are won. So just like I believe that the Lightning of 2020 and 2021, the Dodgers of 2020, the Devils of 95, etc are full value because you can only win the cups you play for. Nothing takes away from the fact that your team is the defending Stanley Cup champions and, as a fan, I can only speculate that must be amazing.

But I'm a fan of a team that pays far higher taxes which, again, isn't the sole reason our teams are where they are (though I'm happy with my team's trajectory) but it plays a factor. And if you refuse to acknowledge that when Barry Trotz himself has literally said it about being GM in Nashville, then there isn't much of a conversation to have here.
 

strattonius

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
4,625
5,315
Surrey, BC
I love the whining. The entire point is that it takes great players, a great GM, owners willing to spend to the cap, and players willing to “be paid less.” Totally agree it shows the incompetence, we had one of the worst owners in sports who set internal caps, made players pay for their game worns, and expected a casino to be built on adjacent land that would pay for the shortcomings he created.

I mean, what’s the frustration? That we’ve been able to keep players who’ve played well here but didn’t do well in other places, or that we have a staff great enough to find these guys in the first place, that we’re now a destination most guys don’t want to leave, or that your team is so incompetent they can’t do the same?

Plenty thought we’d struggle after losing Montour, OEL, our whole 4th line, and Stolarz. Just like they thought we’d struggle to start last year with the injuries we had. Zito’s an elite GM. He’s done an incredible job turning over the roster and creating a top team. The only guys still here since he came in are Barkov, Bob, and Ek.

The delusion is fans like you thinking the “competitive advantage” is what brought us the Cup and kept us competitive. Not many GMs would move a 115 point Huberdeau, a top pair d-man, a first, and a prospect for Tkachuk AND lock him in long term. That was balls and he was roasted for it AND moving off of Brunette after a great offensive season. Those moves pushed us over the edge. But, keep thinking it’s just taxes.

Tampa’s had their own struggles with retaining guys or not fully taking advantage of being a no tax team. See: Sergachev, Stamkos, etc. Other similarities to the Panthers: an incredible owner, great roster building, players who’ve fit well, a staff who found kucherov in the round they did.

Who are you debating though?

The Florida teams have a competitive advantage in free agency. The Florida teams are currently are well managed. Both can be true.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad