Yes, recently, but that wasn't us.Has an ELC ever made people this upset before?
Was it a certain Habs prospect?Yes, recently, but that wasn't us.
Very much a different reason, too.
What we need is a % of players in the CHL and other development leagues that are 5'9" and 5'10", then we need a % of all drafted players at those heights, (bonus how many signed ELCs) and we have the end point which is % of defensemen playing NHL at that height. We can then determine how uphill the journey is for a player of that height. I, of course, am far too lazy to pursue this information.How many defensemen of that height are drafted or signed to ELCs?
It's clearly an impediment, unless you have sufficient skills to offer. The Sharks current management obviously believed Cagnoni has something to offer. The question is whether they were correct.
Ha, well, at least I don't think anyone here is mad about the ELC itself, since it's impossible to argue he doesn't deserve one after the season he just had.Has an ELC ever made people this upset before?
A certain Bruins/Coyotes prospectWas it a certain Habs prospect?
Still one of the scariest moments I've ever watched in my time being a hockey fanOr Dan Boyle getting pulverized by Maxim Lapierre. Blues
C'mon, no one out-upsets this board.Has an ELC ever made people this upset before?
You are management material...What we need is a % of players in the CHL and other development leagues that are 5'9" and 5'10", then we need a % of all drafted players at those heights, (bonus how many signed ELCs) and we have the end point which is % of defensemen playing NHL at that height. We can then determine how uphill the journey is for a player of that height. I, of course, am far too lazy to pursue this information.
Eli Barnett, future All Star.this is all shaping up to Axel Landen being the only one to make the show other than Muk.
I feel like any time a player under 6’0” gets an ELC this board argues about it for days.Has an ELC ever made people this upset before?
Yeah, people should just be happy that players we drafted are on a trajectory to be signed to an ELC.I feel like any time a player under 6’0” gets an ELC this board argues about it for days.
And not just because we have no one else to give them to. Now we have guys who--while still question marks long-term--have been doing very well, way better than what we saw in previous years from our prospects, which feels like a very positive harbinger (even though you obviously can't guarantee anything at this stage).Yeah, people should just be happy that players we drafted are on a trajectory to be signed to an ELC.
We do have a lot of folks who stereotype short players here and seem phobic of short guys despite lots of 5'9 guys making huge impacts in the NHLI feel like any time a player under 6’0” gets an ELC this board argues about it for days.
Exactly, he doesn't need to be the savior of our defence. I think for his projection, he is doing a fine job. If he can pair up with a bigger more stay at home defencemen, he can be quite an add for the future.I remember Ian White being a nice add for our 2011 run. 5’10 185 soaking wet. Cagnoni doesn’t have to be “the guy” but he can be a good piece for our defense.
How many 5’9” players are actually making huge impacts. Even more important how many 5’9” defensemen are making huge impacts.We do have a lot of folks who stereotype short players here and seem phobic of short guys despite lots of 5'9 guys making huge impacts in the NHL
Are you looking at last year only or something? Expand that list to 5 foot 9 and a half or 5 foot 10 and it's not terribly uncommon a height. Spurgeon , Matt Grzelcyk, Krug, vatanen, Girard...u could go on and on. Sime hockeydb sites never change a person's height from their draft year, even if they grew 2 inches.How many 5’9” players are actually making huge impacts. Even more important how many 5’9” defensemen are making huge impacts.
Only 5 total scored more than 40 points, all of which are forwards.
Only 12 scored more than 20 points, one 1 (Krug) is a defenseman.
Only 21 total scored even a single point, adding only a second defenseman (Spurgeon)
Playing in the NHL and succeeding at 5’9” or smaller is incredibly rare. It is a physical contact sport.
Thanks, to be clear I already know how the models work. I just thought it was funny that Hodge would bash on Bader's model a couple days after trying to use Mr. Rooster/JFresh's model to prove his point regarding Barabanov. IMO both models have similar credibility in 2024, not great.If you want to know you can read it here. This is for player evaluations, not prospects, but you can see the complexity.
Wins Above Replacement — High Level Overview