Corso
Registered User
- Aug 13, 2018
- 785
- 815
Remember when people said his upside was a 2C? Good times
I still see that type of upside. I could be totally wrong, but he still hasn't proven a 1C track yet.
Remember when people said his upside was a 2C? Good times
Totally agree.While his engagement has improved to an adequate NHL level, I wouldn't expect a real breakout until he takes a lot more shots.
Remember when people said his upside was a 2C? Good times
Yeah he's 21, I meant he absolutely has 1C upside and those who labelled him a 2C at best were completely out to lunchHe's 21 years old. Give the kid time.
He's absolutely tracking to be a 1CI still see that type of upside. I could be totally wrong, but he still hasn't proven a 1C track yet.
What legit 1Cs were unable to exceed 1 shot per game in their D+3 season?Yeah he's 21, I meant he absolutely has 1C upside and those who labelled him a 2C at best were completely out to lunch
He's absolutely tracking to be a 1C
Yeah he's 21, I meant he absolutely has 1C upside and those who labelled him a 2C at best were completely out to lunch
He's absolutely tracking to be a 1C
Nowhere did I say he has virtually no chance of it, but I am pushing back on the statement that he is "absolutely tracking" to achieve it.We can debate all day what a “legit #1C” is to convolute this discussion even further. Considering there are certainly not 32 of them by most people’s standards and JTM, Hintz, and Thomas are arguably 3 of the top 15 centers in the league - I’m not sure pointing those 3 out as exceptions and saying “see there’s virtually no chance Wright can be a 1C because his shot totals at age 20 in bottom six minutes are so low” is quite the mathematical oddity or ceiling cap it’s being made out to be. Miller scored 3 goals in 30 games at Wright’s age so this is certainly not some bulletproof methodology here.
He’s looking like a very solid #4 overall pick who is trending in the right direction after a bit of stutter in a not unusual non-linear development path. Whether that leads to “true #1 C level” by any random person’s definition or he tops out as a really effective 2C or just generally good “top six center” certainly yet to be discovered.
But as a skeptic of his, I’ve been pretty impressed. Not like “blown away”…but he’s looking better and better.
I think he should be as good as Kadri, Elias Lindholm type centers if he hits middle ground for his potentialNowhere did I say he has virtually no chance of it, but I am pushing back on the statement that he is "absolutely tracking" to achieve it.
Using any reasonable definition of #1C - even if it is just "one of the top 32 centers in the league" - you will find that Wright has done substantially less than most of them had done at the same point in their careers across pretty much every metric.
I don't know about that, seems like they were actually right on with their assessmentsYeah he's 21, I meant he absolutely has 1C upside and those who labelled him a 2C at best were completely out to lunch
No he's really not. Dude is riding a 11.7% on ice shooting percentage at 5v5 and 14.4% in all situations and is still scoring at only a 45 point pace.He's absolutely tracking to be a 1C
That’s what happens when you’re third on the depth chart for centers… you don’t get as many minutes.I don't know about that, seems like they were actually right on with their assessments
No he's really not. Dude is riding a 12.6% on ice shooting percentage at 5v5 and 14.4% in all situations and is still scoring at only a 45 point pace.
It's his on ice shooting percentage, not his individual shooting percentage. 14.4% in all situations is really not sustainable.That’s what happens when you’re third on the depth chart for centers… you don’t get as many minutes.
The two centers ahead of him are shooting at 12.4% and 18.2% in Berniers and Stephenson respectively.
Also I don’t know where you got 14.4% from? Hockeyreference has it at 21.2% for Wright average 13:32 minutes per game.
He’s also only 1 point behind Berniers this season.
Seems to me it’s utilization that’s the problem and not a him problem.
Again, where are you getting the 14.4% from?It's his on ice shooting percentage, not his individual shooting percentage. 14.4% in all situations is really not sustainable.
Natural stat trickAgain, where are you getting the 14.4% from?
So you’re completely ignoring the Powerplay goals?Natural stat trick
So you’re completely ignoring the Powerplay goals?
Too early to give up on the guy but he is looking like a Ryan Hopkins type player
no I am not, ignoring it, its all situations.So you’re completely ignoring the Powerplay goals?
All situations is 21%? 11 goals divided by 52 shots is 21.2%.no I am not, ignoring it, its all situations.
You don't know the difference between on ice sh% and individual sh%?All situations is 21%? 11 goals divided by 52 shots is 21.2%.
I do know the difference but I don’t see how that matters. He’s got a better On-Ice Shooting Percentage and Shooting Percentage than his consistent linemates.You don't know the difference between on ice sh% and individual sh%?
Having an unsustainably high on ice shooting percentage is not a good thing. It means he's likely due for regression.I do know the difference but I don’t see how that matters. He’s got a better On-Ice Shooting Percentage and Shooting Percentage than his consistent linemates.
Which to me shows that he’s carrying that line… so at what point do the stats not show that he’s better than being a 3rd liner being given 13 minutes a night?
He’s even got a better On-Ice Sh% than both centers above him on the depth chart…
Someone tell me if I’m reading his advanced stats wrong…
From what I can see from the same website you used, he looks to have a higher shooting percentage himself due to his shots being high danger shots and not wasting shots on floaters from bad angles. That also tracks from the games of his that I have seen.Having an unsustainably high on ice shooting percentage is not a good thing. It means he's likely due for regression.
He just hates Wright and has said a million times he won't amount to anything more than an average player. Wright could score 30 this year and he would come up with some advanced stats for why it's not impressive and how he was right all along.I do know the difference but I don’t see how that matters. He’s got a better On-Ice Shooting Percentage and Shooting Percentage than his consistent linemates.
Which to me shows that he’s carrying that line… so at what point do the stats not show that he’s better than being a 3rd liner being given 13 minutes a night?
He’s even got a better On-Ice Sh% than both centers above him on the depth chart…
Someone tell me if I’m reading his advanced stats wrong…
His on ice and individual expected goals are both way below his actual goals. That's really not sustainable.From what I can see from the same website you used, he looks to have a higher shooting percentage himself due to his shots being high danger shots and not wasting shots on floaters from bad angles. That also tracks from the games of his that I have seen.
I don't hate him at all, my posts have been extremely supportive, especially with the way he's turned things around.He just hates Wright and has said a million times he won't amount to anything more than an average player. Wright could score 30 this year and he would come up with some advanced stats for why it's not impressive and how he was right all along.
Wright could get 50 points this year as a 20yo. Nobody knows his ceiling, but it is definitely pretty high. Better to just wait and see