C Mitchell Marner - London Knights, OHL (2015 Draft)

Status
Not open for further replies.

hockey38

Registered User
Jun 16, 2014
156
0
How does Marner compare to Bracco?

Both similarly sized but never really hear anyone mention size when talking about Marner.
 

DrJenniferHanson

Cursed By A Gypsy
Aug 31, 2011
1,783
2
43° N lat 81° W long
Not saying he's leaps and bounds ahead of those guys I just like him a little more than then. I'd probably group them in tiers like this:

McJesus




Marner, Konecny, Zacha
Strome, Andersson, Crouse

Eichel would be inbetween McDavid and the next three. (I know he's not in the O but just for reference that's where he'd be.)

I agree with your groupings. I'd tweak moving up Strome to the Marner/Konecny/Zacha group, but that's it. I like all four and would've taken each 3rd-5th if they were available in the '14 draft.

Will be fun watching the 4-horse race of Marner/Konecny/Zacha/Strome with Crouse right on their heels this year (I'm only including forwards).
 

ZeroPT*

Guest
Not saying he's leaps and bounds ahead of those guys I just like him a little more than then. I'd probably group them in tiers like this:

McJesus




Marner, Konecny, Zacha
Strome, Andersson, Crouse

Eichel would be inbetween McDavid and the next three. (I know he's not in the O but just for reference that's where he'd be.)

I wouldn't put Marner ahead of Konecny and Strome from my viewings. I haven't watched Andersson and Zacha but everything I've read about them combined with rankings indicate they're just as good if not better than Marner.

Looking forward to watching them next year. Marner has been good though. I was impressed at the Ivan Hlinka camp.
 

Knightnight

Registered User
Mar 18, 2014
626
109
I wouldn't put Marner ahead of Konecny and Strome from my viewings. I haven't watched Andersson and Zacha but everything I've read about them combined with rankings indicate they're just as good if not better than Marner.

Looking forward to watching them next year. Marner has been good though. I was impressed at the Ivan Hlinka camp.

You are a Konecny homer. Nothing wrong with that TK is an awesome player. But when anyone has a different opinion you get defensive as per the Sprong vs TK debate in another forum. You seem to love using bloggers rankings as gospel. I prefer stats.
Bottom line when TK and MM played on same team against same talent MM has outscored him.
U17s last year, U18s this year. Then in Calgary when they went head to head MM 5 pts TK 2 pts. I think many players in this age group are almost equal and on given day where one may be slightly better. A lot will change in the next year. Kids that keep developing both intellectually and physically will see some shuffling. At this time the 3-20 spots are still wide open.:yo:
 

HockeySauce

Registered User
Jan 26, 2011
16,349
759
From the first pre-season game I saw from him in London last year, you could tell he was going to be a special player. His vision, playmaking and skating are all outstanding. He can stop on a dime and make a play to anyone on the ice. His decision making is also quite strong, considering his age. And to top it off, he's a good defensive player that works hard to get back on the backcheck and hound players.

He'll be a top-7 pick by the end of the year. The only reason he won't go higher is because this draft is insane.
 

ZeroPT*

Guest
You are a Konecny homer. Nothing wrong with that TK is an awesome player. But when anyone has a different opinion you get defensive as per the Sprong vs TK debate in another forum. You seem to love using bloggers rankings as gospel. I prefer stats.
Bottom line when TK and MM played on same team against same talent MM has outscored him.
U17s last year, U18s this year. Then in Calgary when they went head to head MM 5 pts TK 2 pts. I think many players in this age group are almost equal and on given day where one may be slightly better. A lot will change in the next year. Kids that keep developing both intellectually and physically will see some shuffling. At this time the 3-20 spots are still wide open.:yo:

I used the rankings because the other poster said that most rankings had sprong ahead of Konecny. Which was clearly wrong. I don't mind having a player above another, it's all opinion. My pet peeve is when people literally make stuff up to prove their point. Notice how I have a strong opinion on Konecny, it's because he's he prospect I've seen the most and he I can actually judge accurately.

The problem with using straight up stats like points as you're doing is that it ignores context. Konecny played on a shockingly bad 67's team and still put up great numbers versus Marner who played on a stronger knights team and played with better players like Tierney and Rupert, yet produced less. Taking U18 and U17 is faulty because it I a tiny sample size.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

VictoriaJetsFan

Registered User
Mar 24, 2013
4,239
2,256
Just found some extended video on youtube of Barzal, Konecny and Marner.

They all look incredible.

But they also look shockingly similar. Very similar size and playing style I found. They all appear to have magic hands, have high IQ and all seem to have that highlight reel toe drag going on as well. I can't see any of them not becoming at least a point a game number 1 center in the NHL.

As a Winnipeg Jets fan I would be over the moon if I had one of these guys setting up Nick Ehlers on one line while Scheifle feeds Kane on another. That's an elite group of young forwards.

These are just youtube videos a bad way to scout and I will only see Barzal play this year.

But for the sake of perspective, these guys have very little between them and it shows what a draft this is going to be, its over the top incredible..
 

Snippit

Registered User
Dec 5, 2012
16,665
9,999
I used the rankings because the other poster said that most rankings had sprong ahead of Konecny. Which was clearly wrong. I don't mind having a player above another, it's all opinion. My pet peeve is when people literally make stuff up to prove their point. Notice how I have a strong opinion on Konecny, it's because he's he prospect I've seen the most and he I can actually judge accurately.

The problem with using straight up stats like points as you're doing is that it ignores context. Konecny played on a shockingly bad 67's team and still put up great numbers versus Marner who played on a stronger knights team and played with better players like Tierney and Rupert, yet produced less. Taking U18 and U17 is faulty because it I a tiny sample size.

Konecny also had more playing time than Marner, so playing on a bad team may be an advantage. Marner was sometimes buried in the bottom 6 with Yakimowicz or McCarron.

I distinctly remembered Marner's production dropping when he was playing on the fourth line.
 

DrJenniferHanson

Cursed By A Gypsy
Aug 31, 2011
1,783
2
43° N lat 81° W long
I used the rankings because the other poster said that most rankings had sprong ahead of Konecny. Which was clearly wrong. I don't mind having a player above another, it's all opinion. My pet peeve is when people literally make stuff up to prove their point. Notice how I have a strong opinion on Konecny, it's because he's he prospect I've seen the most and he I can actually judge accurately.

The problem with using straight up stats like points as you're doing is that it ignores context. Konecny played on a shockingly bad 67's team and still put up great numbers versus Marner who played on a stronger knights team and played with better players like Tierney and Rupert, yet produced less. Taking U18 and U17 is faulty because it I a tiny sample size.

Marner played with Tierney (& Domi) for a stretch in the first half in which he produced at a PPG+ clip, but never on any consistent basis with the Ruperts.

In the second half, Marner played the vast majority with Yakimowicz (STL, 6th) and MacDonald. When Bell/Austin were out at the end and Welychka moved to D, Marner played that stretch with Smith and McCarron.
 

ZeroPT*

Guest
Marner played with Tierney (& Domi) for a stretch in the first half in which he produced at a PPG+ clip, but never on any consistent basis with the Ruperts.

In the second half, Marner played the vast majority with Yakimowicz (STL, 6th) and MacDonald. When Bell/Austin were out at the end and Welychka moved to D, Marner played that stretch with Smith and McCarron.

My mistake. Whenever I watched London (wasn't much because I hate them) he would play with Rupert and Tierney. Guess not.
 

Scarbarian*

Guest
Starting to heat up lately. 9 points in the 3 games and scored a hatty yesterday. He has been Knights best player the past 4 games.

It was only a matter of time. My prediction is that he will end up a Bruin come draft day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Garyboy

Registered User
Oct 31, 2010
2,193
227
Toronto
How does Marner compare to Bracco?

Both similarly sized but never really hear anyone mention size when talking about Marner.

Very similar skill-set's. Next to McDavid, their hockey IQ's are probably the best of the upcoming draft prospects.
 

Starry Knight

Tele-Wyatt
Jun 9, 2013
3,928
2,066
KW
Could Knights fans compare Marner in his draft year to Sam Gagner? Is he a better player at age 17?

I would say overall Marner is better. In hindsight you can say Sam Gagner was a product of Pat Kane. Marner drives the play even when Domi is on the ice with him on the PP.
 

Ace88*

Guest
My feeling for a long time is that Marner isn't #1C material, more of a #2. Always felt he was a bit of a product of the London hype. But if that production keeps up and he keeps growing then it might be time to adjust expectations.
 

Knightnight

Registered User
Mar 18, 2014
626
109
My feeling for a long time is that Marner isn't #1C material, more of a #2. Always felt he was a bit of a product of the London hype. But if that production keeps up and he keeps growing then it might be time to adjust expectations.

what did London gave to do with him leading Canada at the Ivan hlinka in scoring or leading scorer at development camp in Calgary or 2nd in scoring at the u17s the year before. If anything he has not had near the hype of other top prospects period.
 

Scarbarian*

Guest
Way better than Gagner, its not even funny. He doesn't even remotely have a talent like Kane to play beside him.

I truly think this guy could be a #1 C in the NHL, his hockey IQ is at near top of this draft class outside of McDavid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad