Blows my mind people are discussing this seriously... like PPG is the Da Vinci code of prospects.. You have to look at what exactly the kind of player you are dealing with... Okposo and Wheeler never cracked a PPG in college, Getzlaf, Ladd, Horton all did not blow the doors off junior. James Neal, Wayne Simmonds too. His post-draft year production is similar to Scheifele's too. It is pretty clear when you look at the kind of players all these guys are, that if you have size at your advantage and a certain skillset you do not need as many points to translate as a smaller player... You have to watch and evaluate the skillset of the player at the end of the day and take into account many factors..
It is so clear that half the NHL's scouting departments routinely **** it up?
Obviously you want to do both. You want to combine the too schools together and 9/10 times pick the guy that excels at both.
basic PPG draft methods have outdrafted nearly 50% of NHL teams in tests. That's absolutely shameful for the scouting community anyway you slice it. the most basic versions beat over 25% of teams.
do you know how many teams should be getting beaten by PPG drafting and publicly available data that takes almost no manipulation? zero. Zero is the only acceptable answer for the multi-million dollar scouting departments that can be undermined by a simple equation.
and i'd imagine the work the PCS guys got to (which is more indepth then simply PPG and height) started beating teams even more then that.