C Jett Luchanko - Guelph Storm, OHL (2024, 13th, PHI)

Kshahdoo

Registered User
Mar 23, 2008
20,149
9,753
Moscow, Russia
He should sign a contract with one of European professional leagues. Even a weaker one like Czech (which isn't that weak actually) is still much better than CHL. And there are other advantages: earning some money, getting used to being adult, seeing the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Acallabeth

Peasy

Registered User
May 25, 2012
17,570
16,282
Star Shoppin
He should sign a contract with one of European professional leagues. Even a weaker one like Czech (which isn't that weak actually) is still much better than CHL. And there are other advantages: earning some money, getting used to being adult, seeing the world.
Cant just willy nilly throw away contracts youre signed to and go play somewhere else...
 

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
31,971
32,781
Dartmouth,NS
He should sign a contract with one of European professional leagues. Even a weaker one like Czech (which isn't that weak actually) is still much better than CHL. And there are other advantages: earning some money, getting used to being adult, seeing the world.
That is not allowed. Would have to be released by his OHL team.
 

saintunspecified

Registered User
Nov 30, 2017
6,323
4,551
Very jealous of Flyers fans. He's definitely a year away, and would benefit playing in top level jr competitions, along with developing his shot. But the combo of athleticism, vision, and intelligence is there. Don't rush him, or you'll end up with stunting him like my Isles did with Josh Bailey. Similar places in development - dealing with NHL physicality at 18 can create a tentativeness that lasts.
 

Alex K

Registered User
Apr 20, 2016
2,654
3,723
Earth
Zero reason to rush him too, Laughton is the 3C right now anyways.
jim-carrey-vomit.gif
 

Gregor Samsa

Registered User
Sep 5, 2020
3,790
4,426
Anything more than a 9 game trial is a mistake. Who knows what Couts could have been if he wasn’t thrown into the 3C defensive position as an 18 year old. They better not stunt Luchanko’s offense
 

FlyguyOX

Registered User
Jun 29, 2018
4,189
4,184
Anything more than a 9 game trial is a mistake. Who knows what Couts could have been if he wasn’t thrown into the 3C defensive position as an 18 year old. They better not stunt Luchanko’s offense
Couts peaked as a selke-winning 1C. I think he turned out fine.

But I agree Luchanko should go back to juniors. Don't want him to not develop offense like Sillinger.
 

Gregor Samsa

Registered User
Sep 5, 2020
3,790
4,426
Couts peaked as a selke-winning 1C. I think he turned out fine.

But I agree Luchanko should go back to juniors. Don't want him to not develop offense like Sillinger.
It took him forever to get respectable offense though and he was pigeonholed in as a defensive specialist for years. Maybe he would have a higher offensive ceiling if he was developed properly
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,419
11,414
Because he didn't get PP usage.
Ya it was almost like couturier was pigeonholed as a defensive guy or something.

That being said I don't think that Luchanko is the offensive prospect that he was even with his outstanding camp he probably ends up back in junior but it's torts so maybe he plays him more and sit Michov as that sounds like a Torts mindf**k season.
 

HeadLiceHatty

Registered User
Dec 26, 2011
3,313
3,548
Tokyo, Japan
Couts peaked as a selke-winning 1C. I think he turned out fine.

But I agree Luchanko should go back to juniors. Don't want him to not develop offense like Sillinger.

Yeah but the Flyers ruined his development badly, he was an offensive beast in juniors, and then they stunted him by not letting him dominate more and come to the NHL as a more confident / polished prospect.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad