- Jan 24, 2007
- 7,454
- 9,048
Jersey doesn’t plan on contending next season I assume so we can be patient with his physical development. Just have to sell Hall on it.
I don’t agree with this. Next season is when the window opens. It’s time.
Jersey doesn’t plan on contending next season I assume so we can be patient with his physical development. Just have to sell Hall on it.
Are you going to sign Duchene, Panarin and Karlsson?I don’t agree with this. Next season is when the window opens. It’s time.
Are you going to sign Duchene, Panarin and Karlsson?
I don't have any hate towards Jack but, he doesn't look like he is ready to play against men.
A lot needs to happen for his NHL debut next season to become reality.
Gonna have to sign someone, sitting on a ton of cap space, one of those would be a dream. “Overpay” them similar to the Brian Campbell contract in Chicago which signaled their transition into contention.
The fact is Devils should be thinking playoffs for the next 5 years. The core is here (and Hall will leave if we suck). Devils really don’t need another top 5 pick especially if it signals to Hall that he should move on.
He will definitely play in the NHL next season. How good (or bad) he will be, THAT is the question.
Hall will either sign an extension or be traded well before we know where the Devils will pick in 2020.
make that 4 points, completely robbed on a sprawling save lol..kid couldn't get lucky at a brothel if he had $500 in cash on him right now..should have 3 points today, pucks not bouncing his way..
0 points in 4 games that included France and Britain
Jack Hughes - 0 points in 4 games despite his team scoring 22 goals
According to this thread and the Devs board - but he SHOULD have had 10 points so far if he wasn't unlucky
...realize how silly that sounds?
Still think Hughes will be great and this tourney doesn't mean much for him, but it's annoying reading "if XYZ would have done this Hughes would have points!" every single game. You could say that about almost any player....
Jack Hughes - 0 points in 4 games despite his team scoring 22 goals
According to this thread and the Devs board - but he SHOULD have had 10 points so far if he wasn't unlucky
...realize how silly that sounds?
Still think Hughes will be great and this tourney doesn't mean much for him, but it's annoying reading "if XYZ would have done this Hughes would have points!" every single game. You could say that about almost any player....
Jack Hughes - 0 points in 4 games despite his team scoring 22 goals
According to this thread and the Devs board - but he SHOULD have had 10 points so far if he wasn't unlucky
...realize how silly that sounds?
Still think Hughes will be great and this tourney doesn't mean much for him, but it's annoying reading "if XYZ would have done this Hughes would have points!" every single game. You could say that about almost any player....
why is it annoying reading? if Hughes looked like a turd out there then people would rightfully say so, but he has been buzzing around all tourney long and just hasn't gotten the bounces.Jack Hughes - 0 points in 4 games despite his team scoring 22 goals
According to this thread and the Devs board - but he SHOULD have had 10 points so far if he wasn't unlucky
...realize how silly that sounds?
Still think Hughes will be great and this tourney doesn't mean much for him, but it's annoying reading "if XYZ would have done this Hughes would have points!" every single game. You could say that about almost any player....
why couldn't the same be said for Kakko? if that has been happening with him then things like that should be known. it gives people an idea who haven't been watching the actual games and just stat check that the reality is even a bit different than what the stats say. people can say Hughes should have 5-6 points by now without it impacting anything Kakko has done. and people following Kakko could say he should have 10 points right now if things were going his way, and I would appreciate reading that since I don't get to see all of his games. the complexes on here absolutely need to stop.With same logic Kakko would have 3 points against USA and 10 points overall with better luck and team mates finishing wide open nets. I love Hughes but this defending his really weak play by these kind of comments are signs of being insecure. Trying to find every crumble of positive things in his play this tournament with a flashlight without looking entire picture. Hughes had multiple turnovers and his positive impact play precentage with the puck was around 60% against Great Britain. He still plays junior game mentally with same kind of frame. If this mean him being extremely raw i can see his really high potential and reason him be #1 ranked player.