The responses seem almost canned at this point. Not only that, but people keep moving the goalposts to the point of giving you whiplash. You can't ever keep up with them.
The kid comes out of no where, get drafted , tears it up and leaves the a lot of people wondering if he should have gone higher than where he was drafted. Little do the scouts know, at HFboards we already have the solution! Forget potential. Forget any possibility of passing any and all eye tests. Every argument. Every prospect, with the exception of the top 1-5, are boiled down to sample-size fights over the internet.
Larkin has, so far, proven his naysayers wrong so many times by now that these same people just keep adding to the already long list of things.
He starts producing more than initially scouted (although the report stated the potential was there)
*Let's see if he can continue, and it's not a fluke
Keeps continuing on a bigger stage
*Flukey. It's because he was on a 3rd line
Keeps producing
*He needs to see if he can do it in the pro's
Does in in the AHL
*Needs to show he can produce in the NHL
Playing well in the NHL, and producing
*product of his linemates, and it's a small sample-size.
I'm sure he'll scratch this one off his list and people will bump it up to
*It's just one season, he needs to show he can have repeat success in the NHL.
I honestly haven't seen a prospect have to go through so many hoops just to a simple nod from the hockey fanbase. Although, HFboards are pretty much hung up on drafting pedigree. So if this dude was top 5, and doing as well as he was/is? There would be 5 threads about him. Be he's not. So in stead he have Mceichel threads all over the place stating "it's just a matter of time before the start producing."
Gotta love HFboards.