i just dont see where the problem is really, I have the opinion that a Leo would do better. Why does that bother you or any one else? I'm not even saying Bedard wont be good, im not saying he wont be generational. Im only saying that Leo in my opinion would do better (overall). Why is this a problem, how does this affect anyone's life i don't understand. I'm i forcing my ideaology on any one? No, its an opinion based on facts both objective and subjective. Why are we stretching this.
If you want to debate me on the gap, then lets do it. No, the gap is not as big as you're saying. Its a pure fantasy, an idea that has been fueled by the media and overhyped by the fans. Slovakia almost beat Canada and they dint even had Slaf.
No the gap is not big, Bedard's game is not a guaranteed to be transferable in the NHL right away, who knows maybe never. Its a different level, its a different speed, less space, goalies don't leave much room.
Im sorry man, it took Slovakia 1 really good goalie to shut down (almost) the whole team Canada. The game Canada won 11-1 where everyone lost their panties that night was a different goalie.... the moment they put a big dude who's actually good at goaltending Bedard struggled scoring, he had alot of opportunities to do so and only managed 2 againts Slovakia.... yeah Slovakia...
So imagine this now... Bedard playing for a crappy team and facing NHL defenses and NHL goalies... he's not going to get the same amount of chances to score goals, neither the space nor will the goalies look like swiss cheeze.
Matter of fact i dont believe in NHL generational talents any more who aren't at least 6.1. McDavid is the guy right now and there's no body that will come close to him. The way the league is setup, i don't see any rookie right now scoring 100 pts in their first season like a Crosby, Ovy or McDavid... because thats what he's being compared too.