R Zardo
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2022
- 50
- 74
if Bedard and Roenick had a kid it would look like Gabriel Jarret
Because it just reeks of looking for something to criticize. It's been 2 games. He'll be better in game 20, just as he'll be better in year 2, just as he'll be better in year 5 (like all NHL stars are).
But that fact that these 2 games are his starting point is pretty scary, although not unexpected, and I say this as a fan of a team in Chicago's division, so him being underwhelming would actually be good for my team. I just don't see that.
How could you even say one way or another based off the first two games of his career?if the NHL spends millions and millions to pump a player up, we're allowed to critize said player.
Also how many people working for the NHL are on this board gaslighting us with non sentical comments like "he's the best player on the ice"
People are just pointing out he's not a generational talent thats all.. nothing wrong with that
After 2 games, there's nothing right with it either.if the NHL spends millions and millions to pump a player up, we're allowed to critize said player.
Also how many people working for the NHL are on this board gaslighting us with non sentical comments like "he's the best player on the ice"
People are just pointing out he's not a generational talent thats all.. nothing wrong with that
After 2 games, there's nothing right with it either.
McDavid just put up the 2nd best non-Gretzky/Lemieux season ever. McDavid's first 4 NHL games, as an older player than Bedard, by the way:
1 goal, 1 point, -5 and 26% on face-offs.
And that was on a team with more raw forward talent than Chicago currently has.
This is why the conclusions you are trying to draw are meaningless at this point in time. Might you ultimately be right, and he'll just end up an elite player and not "generational"? Absolutely you might be. But there's nothing about what's going on right now that proves anything close to it. The rush to try and connect these things is pretty revealing, IMO.
McDavid could barely raise the puck off the ice in his rookie season. I remember him constantly trying to stickhandle right into the goalie like he did in junior, but he figured it out.After 2 games, there's nothing right with it either.
McDavid just put up the 2nd best non-Gretzky/Lemieux season ever. McDavid's first 4 NHL games, as an older player than Bedard, by the way:
1 goal, 1 point, -5 and 26% on face-offs.
And that was on a team with more raw forward talent than Chicago currently has.
This is why the conclusions you are trying to draw are meaningless at this point in time. Might you ultimately be right, and he'll just end up an elite player and not "generational"? Absolutely you might be. But there's nothing about what's going on right now that proves anything close to it, and the rush to try and connect these things is pretty revealing, IMO.
I don't think you read the post though, all he's saying is that he wants to see Bedard score with his shot.
How's that a bad opinion?
if the NHL spends millions and millions to pump a player up, we're allowed to critize said player.
Also how many people working for the NHL are on this board gaslighting us with non sentical comments like "he's the best player on the ice"
People are just pointing out he's not a generational talent thats all.. nothing wrong with that
I said that, because he was the best player on the ice last night, and now I’m pissed that the nhl hasn’t sent me my paycheck.if the NHL spends millions and millions to pump a player up, we're allowed to critize said player.
Also how many people working for the NHL are on this board gaslighting us with non sentical comments like "he's the best player on the ice"
People are just pointing out he's not a generational talent thats all.. nothing wrong with that
I said that, because he was the best player on the ice last night, and now I’m pissed that the nhl hasn’t sent me my paycheck.
Maybe there would be a point in that statement if you and everyone else who spews that garbage weren’t wrong lol.if the NHL spends millions and millions to pump a player up, we're allowed to critize said player.
Also how many people working for the NHL are on this board gaslighting us with non sentical comments like "he's the best player on the ice"
People are just pointing out he's not a generational talent thats all.. nothing wrong with that
This is one f the best takes ive seen in awhile around here.After 2 games, there's nothing right with it either.
McDavid just put up the 2nd best non-Gretzky/Lemieux season ever. McDavid's first 4 NHL games, as an older player than Bedard, by the way:
1 goal, 1 point, -5 and 26% on face-offs.
And that was on a team with more raw forward talent than Chicago currently has.
This is why the conclusions you are trying to draw are meaningless at this point in time. Might you ultimately be right, and he'll just end up an elite player and not "generational"? Absolutely you might be. But there's nothing about what's going on right now that proves anything close to it, and the rush to try and connect these things is pretty revealing, IMO.
"One, two, five!"This thread will be so fun to re-read 5 years from now
He is going to score a lot of goals with his shot.I don't think you read the post though, all he's saying is that he wants to see Bedard score with his shot.
How's that a bad opinion?
Most of us Blackhawk fans hope / pray the sameMost of us (Canadians) hope / pray Bedard will be the second coming of Sid or Connor but there is no downside to lowered expectations.