DinosaurBones
Registered User
- Sep 18, 2018
- 402
- 330
Sick argument so far guys youre doing great.
Anyways kids an ace. So carry on
Anyways kids an ace. So carry on
No idea. One was in his 17 year old season. The other in his 18 year old season.
That's how hockey works in Canada. Your age is based on your birth year. This isn't a controversial, or remotely new, topic. Except maybe to you.
I’ve seen close to 20 of his games. With the puck on his stick, he absolutely tilts the ice, as do the other players I listed. He’s basically impossible for defenders to contain at the WHL level, and I’ll bet it’ll be the same in his prime in the NHL.
However, when the other team has the puck, he’s not elite at winning it back like Sid or McDavid, who are absolute puck hounds (Sid especially). This is totally fine, as I noted I think he’s very comparable to many of the NHL’s best forwards in this regard (Kane, Kucherov, Ovechkin, Jack Hughes, Pastrnak, Marner, Stamkos, etc.), it’s just a difference between him and Sid/McDavid, who he often gets compared to.
I think similar to prime Patrick Kane. More goals, fewer assists, similar point totals.
I don't deny that he could be a lot better than Kane, but I think this is a reasonable expectation.He'll get more goals and assists than Kane
Patrick Kane is a 3 time Stanley Cup Champion and one of the greatest players of his generation. That’s a pretty nice floor.Here is the thing. Bedard seems to be a little more about himself than McDavid it seems. That stuff isn't going to make you generational in the NHL. McDavid didn't give a f about no haircut, wore worn out unironed suits and just seemed more hockey nerd than Bedard. Bedard seems like a guy who might let the fame get to him a bit. If he does, he will be more like a Patrick Kane than a Connor McDavid.
Here is the thing. Bedard seems to be a little more about himself than McDavid it seems. That stuff isn't going to make you generational in the NHL. McDavid didn't give a f about no haircut, wore worn out unironed suits and just seemed more hockey nerd than Bedard. Bedard seems like a guy who might let the fame get to him a bit. If he does, he will be more like a Patrick Kane than a Connor McDavid.
Yup! Apparently comparing Bedard to a player who has over 1200 pts and 3 cups is insulting!lmao people getting mad because he's being compared to Kane as if that's insulting...this thread must be filled with Connor's cousins.
The whole team got their hair cut like that for the playoffs.Here is the thing. Bedard seems to be a little more about himself than McDavid it seems. That stuff isn't going to make you generational in the NHL. McDavid didn't give a f about no haircut, wore worn out unironed suits and just seemed more hockey nerd than Bedard. Bedard seems like a guy who might let the fame get to him a bit. If he does, he will be more like a Patrick Kane than a Connor McDavid.
Haha. Talk about ready WAY too much into absolutely nothing.Here is the thing. Bedard seems to be a little more about himself than McDavid it seems. That stuff isn't going to make you generational in the NHL. McDavid didn't give a f about no haircut, wore worn out unironed suits and just seemed more hockey nerd than Bedard. Bedard seems like a guy who might let the fame get to him a bit. If he does, he will be more like a Patrick Kane than a Connor McDavid.
True. Bedard will be great.Haha. Talk about ready WAY too much into absolutely nothing.
For every Mcdavid and Crosby there are guys like Daigle and Lafreniere who bust. Do I see Bedard busting personally? Hell no, but I am not going to anoint him the next Mcdavid because @Bfan14 said so.Very strange comment after all his interviews during the WJC, asking the reporters to stop talking about him
You must of been one of the posters who thought it was blasphemy that McDavid was being called the future best player in the world because he "never stepped foot on the ice".
Here is another thing. If Bedard does end up a better Patrick Kane , how is that strange ? Thats about as close to generational you can get without being generational, unless you think we should anoint him as Gretzky since he put up Gretzky like numbers in the dub ? Crosby was even better in his last junior year, McDavid averaged about the same ppg and absolutely annihilated the stats sheet in the playoffs. Every generation player has to prove himself in the big show. McDavid has exceeded his expectations so far. Its Bedard's turn.Very strange comment after all his interviews during the WJC, asking the reporters to stop talking about him
You must of been one of the posters who thought it was blasphemy that McDavid was being called the future best player in the world because he "never stepped foot on the ice".
lmao people getting mad because he's being compared to Kane as if that's insulting...this thread must be filled with Connor's cousins.
When did I compare the player to Lafreniere? I said there are guys who have busted or didn't turn out as great as people thought. Two examples being Lafreniere and Daigle. I never said Bedard will you clown.It's not just me saying so, its pretty much everyone.
Comparing him to Lafreniere just shows how little you know.
And if he was the only one who didn’t get the haircut this guy would say that he’s not a team player.The whole team got their hair cut like that for the playoffs.
He's a Matthews caliber prospect. That's nothing to get upset about.Every single expert sure as hell thinks so. I couldn't care less what the contrarions who also thought Eichel > McDavid have to say.
Bedard has exactly two comparable in the Modern NHL. Crosby and McDavid.
But sure, if Bedard suddenly decides he doesn't like Hockey and wants to be an actor like Daigle then you may have a point
Lol look how worked up you're getting about a prospect being compared to the reining Hart and Rocket winner.Hes been vastly better than Matthews as a prospect but okkkk guy, if @whiskeyythe devil says so then it must be true! Let's ignore what he's actually done and that everyone who's involved in hockey knows he's a generational prospect
I can't wait to bring this thread back up
In your opinion was Matthews or Eichel a better prospect? Obviously Matthews is the better NHLer but I’m talking on draft night which guy would you have taken if they were the same age.He's a Matthews caliber prospect. That's nothing to get upset about.
I think Eichel was probably the slightly better prospect because of his skating. If he could have stayed healthy who knows but before that point they were pretty much neck and neck.In your opinion was Matthews or Eichel a better prospect? Obviously Matthews is the better NHLer but I’m talking on draft night which guy would you have taken if they were the same age.
How am I wrong? Is he in the NHL yet? You obviously don't even know what moving goalposts means.And look how wrong you are? You've been moving goal posts this whole thread, it's quite hilarious how much he keeps proving you wrong