He’s a bigger, stronger, better skating Jason Robertson (6’4”, 205 vs. 6’2”, 201). Leason is essentially the same age (April 30 vs. July 22, both of 99) and both have played on CHL teams with limited help this season (although Robertson was traded a day or two ago). While Robertson has put up 38 points (23 goals) in 24 games, Leason has put up an even more impressive stat line of 47 points (22 goals) in 22 games, and has done so while being far more offensively consistent and, in my opinion as a non-professional scout who has seen both play just a handful of times, significantly more reliable defensively.
I think most teams would be fine with trading a pick for this year’s draft between ~20 and ~30 for Robertson, so there’s no reason why a pick in that range wouldn’t be well used on Leason. He’s older than other prospects, sure, but he’s so much better right now as well. For teams picking in that range (read: contenders), why would you gamble on another guy being better in two years, who’s further away from helping?