SI90
Registered User
On one hand people say, the draft age should be increased to 19 years, because 18 is too early to say, what a player this or that prospect will become. On the other hand, when they see 19 year old (ok, he'll be 20 at the draft) tearing up CHL, they say, he's too old to be picked high...
Mostly because of the way the 18 year olds have performed in the same year..... If there was an 18 year old Leason vs a 20 year old Leason having identical years the 18 year old would be picked first every time.
Some players develop later. That’s why you’ll see undrafted players that make it to the NHL. But if you have a 17/18 year old performing at a certain level your more likely to expect them to continue to develop and get better as they get older.