Tim Stutzle would be mine from a stylistic POV but I don’t see his ceiling at 90/100 points like stutzle, more like 60/70Who is a good player comp for this guy?
Tim Stutzle would be mine from a stylistic POV but I don’t see his ceiling at 90/100 points like stutzle, more like 60/70
Shorter than 6’0.Why is this guy falling on most draft lists?
Kind of ridiculous, he's 5'11, but he's not 5'9 like Benson. I mean 164lbs is pretty light but still he's 18 and in his draft season.Shorter than 6’0.
I’d pick him second no hesitation.Kind of ridiculous, he's 5'11, but he's not 5'9 like Benson. I mean 164lbs is pretty light but still he's 18 and in his draft season.
They should take a RHD.Next Sabres pick
Exactly. Enough with the moderately sized, shifty forwards. Best D available with their 1st pick, then tale Elick or Emery with their 2nd.They should take a RHD.
Yes but I am personally skeptical of yamm, lev is good but his strengths provides more of what we already have on the blue line, if we pick a d I'd rather slide dahlin to the right and puck silayev or Dickinson. If we draft high like where we are currently slotted I would take Lindstrom, demimedov or catton and skip on eiserman, Iginla is another decent option over eiserman for me personally as well.They should take a RHD.
Who? Hehe...and that handle. Paints a picture I can't get out of my head now, ffs...Yes but I am personally skeptical of yamm, lev is good but his strengths provides more of what we already have on the blue line, if we pick a d I'd rather slide dahlin to the right and puck silayev or Dickinson. If we draft high like where we are currently slotted I would take Lindstrom, demimedov or catton and skip on eiserman, Iginla is another decent option over eiserman for me personally as well.
Next Sabres pick
At a certain point you run out of spots in your lineup for certain types of players, and you can say that someone will be traded or it will work its way out, yet I still think it hurts the team’s leverage when trading a player and I also think the way it works its way out is always a negative where someone doesn’t make it or is traded for peanuts, so if they hope to get the most value they should draft a player at another position and hope to make it all work.If the Sabres use their pick they would be wise to choose the best player available. Unless they're picking in the top 2, that player is Catton. Honestly don't get this crap about Buffalo taking slight players. The three biggest disappointments this year have been Cozens, Thompson, and Tuch. In an awful year the pleasant surprises have been Benson and Mitts. It's almost as if there's more to hockey success than size.
I agree with this and taking a Dman might be the best option...unless Catton is there and then I just take him and then figure things out.At a certain point you run out of spots in your lineup for certain types of players, and you can say that someone will be traded or it will work its way out, yet I still think it hurts the team’s leverage when trading a player and I also think the way it works its way out is always a negative where someone doesn’t make it or is traded for peanuts, so if they hope to get the most value they should draft a player at another position and hope to make it all work.