Get ready. We're going to hear that a lot. Kadri, Nylander, Marner and now Matthews. All "the next Gagner" lol.
2 days earlier........Whether Matthews ends up in Toronto or Winnipeg. It is important to note, had he been born one day earlier, he would have ended up in the 2015 draft. He a very good year as should be expected as one of the older 18 year olds in this draft.
He did what he had to do this year. He is worthy of #1 overall, had Laine not had such an extraordinary this year which leaves the door slightly open. Matthews would be a shoe in for #1 overall.
2 days earlier........
He'll go one, can't wait to see you rank him 3 or lower on your list though.
I think its pretty important when examining CHL or USHL guys, just due to the fact they have played there 3rd JR season, instead of only 2. But at the top of the draft its fairly limited, Gretzky and McDavid are both January birthday's and Lemieux is a late birthday. I think its also unique how most top American players are born late, such as Eichel, Kessel and Patrick Kane. The advantage of January over Decembers in Canada is partially a function of how we divide our leagues, in the United States the cut-off date can vary.Eichel was also a late birthday in his draft like Auston. Not a big deal, more of a sign that he's a bit more physically mature.
Being a half a year older or so than someone doesn't much much in the long run.
Eichel was also a late birthday in his draft like Auston. Not a big deal, more of a sign that he's a bit more physically mature.
Being a half a year older or so than someone doesn't much much in the long run.
yeah, and if they post it, its open to be criticized. But whatever, the Finns are great, but I'm ecstatic Toronto has the first choice, and going into the WC I have Matthews 1 and I doubt it changes.Why does it matter to you where I or anyone else ranks him? This is a prospects board, everyone has an opinion and they can rank whoever they want wherever they want.
yeah, and if they post it, its open to be criticized. But whatever, the Finns are great, but I'm ecstatic Toronto has the first choice, and going into the WC I have Matthews 1 and I doubt it changes.
yeah, and if they post it, its open to be criticized. But whatever, the Finns are great, but I'm ecstatic Toronto has the first choice, and going into the WC I have Matthews 1 and I doubt it changes.
I think its pretty important when examining CHL or USHL guys, just due to the fact they have played there 3rd JR season, instead of only 2. But at the top of the draft its fairly limited, Gretzky and McDavid are both January birthday's and Lemieux is a late birthday. I think its also unique how most top American players are born late, such as Eichel, Kessel and Patrick Kane. The advantage of January over Decembers in Canada is partially a function of how we divide our leagues, in the United States the cut-off date can vary.
Matthews is 7 and 8 months older than Laine(just turned 18 a little over a week ago) and Pujujarvi(who is still 17 for another week)
In a draft year, this is significant to note. Considering Matthews was 18 for the entire draft year born Sept 17.
A big skilled, #1 Center, that may be a franchise player. Too hard for me to pass up on a big skilled, winger(s). I don't even have to think about it. Matthews will go number 1 if I a betting man.
You build a team up the middle. I have always been a believer of this. Teams strong up the middle are usually contenders for years to come.
Agreed.
Yep, that was the thinking in January, 5 months ago, before we saw what Laine did. And that does change the thinking. And it may change again after the WJC. This is why there are before the season, mid season, and Final Rankings for the draft. No one makes a ranking in January and does not adjust it. Matthews is a very good propect, no one will disagree with this. But it would be presumptuous to believe the Leafs as you are a Leafs fan, that we know who they have decided on picking before the WHC are played.
[Tweet]726582194760732674[/MEDIA]
Doubt they skip the potential 1C, just like you initially said. Whether or not that's the right choice won't be known until years down the road.