Agreed on the above.
Is the complaint from the Sabres board because like all Buyouts, they need to incur dead cap in years 4-6 when they expect to be a much better club and would rather have taken all of the dead cap charges over what would have been the duration of his 3 years left?
I did wonder if the NHL would ever allow a team the option of how they wish to take the buyout cap charge, like they do in the NFL, where they have the option of designating when a player is cut (June 1 before/after), which then determines whether the club takes the dead cap chares over 1 or 2 years (most opt to do 2 years).
Thus, for teams like Buf/Phi/CBS, etc. who are not competing I think if given the option they'd eat the Skinner/Atkinson/Boqvist buyout charges over their remaining term of the contract. Whereas teams like Edm, can't afford to do that with Jack Campbell given their competitive window.
Skinner's buyout is $1.44, $4.44, $6.44 over the next 3 seasons then $2.44 for the following 3.
So, would it be better to have had the option to just eat $3.9, $6.9, and then $8.9 mill over 3 seasons instead?