is the answer jesus
Registered User
If Savoie achieves his ceiling this is a bad trade for Buffalo barring some miraculous upswing in McLeod's trajectory as a player. That said I don't have to like the deal to see why Adams did it. He wanted to remake the middle 6 and McLeod is decent, youngish, and relatively cost controlled for multiple seasons. I think the reality is a little of both sides in this situation. It seems that Buffalo may have soured a bit on Savoie and Adams just couldn't maneuver through both the trade and free agent market to get a player at a more reasonable cost.I would surmise there's a combination of reasons why Savoie was chosen as the trade chip in this. Buffalo doesn't lack for high end prospect trade chips, and they did need to rebuild that bottom 6 for sure, as they don't lack for offensive power in their roster top 6, even with Skinner gone.
If McLeod fulfills his role here in Buffalo, and Savoie achieves his ceiling, it looks to be a win/win trade for both organizations.