bl02
Registered User
- Jan 13, 2014
- 33,879
- 24,760
And I thought maybe we could get a Thomas and a Blais or a Sanford. Maybe the market was crap for Buch?
But will only cost 1/3 of buch.Blais is 9 months younger than Buch and has a career high of 15 points.
Drury is sure failing at that.
That extra kick to the nuts eh?!?!I'm waiting for the other shoe filled with salt to fall into the wound, like Buch signing with STL for something like 4.5m x 7 years.
With this move and Goodrow, I am not feeling enamored with the Drury era. These are moves a contender makes to put them over the top. These are not moves for a young team trying to earn a playoff spot for the first time in years.
Right, I agree.They are for sure NHL players. and for anyone who watched the last 2-3 playoff seasons they are playoffs type players too where the intensity goes up big time.
I think we should be good. No more trades should be influenced by the grit/tough guy need.
Not supremely convinced that building a team from the bottom six up is the most intuitive plan.
Blais was the player the Blues inserted into the lineup in game 6 against the Stars. The Blues lost game 5 at home. Dallas went back home up 3-2. The Blues decided to dress Blais and his energy brought some life to the Blues. They went on to win the series in 7. Blais scored a goal in game 6. He had a great game.
Drury remembers that game because the Rangers were getting a 1st round pick in 2019 if the Dallas beat the Blues.
Because let’s be honest. Half these GMs don’t know what the f*** they are doing. I don’t think Drury is one of those. I think that dumbass in Philly and the dumbass in Van are.I don’t disagree. Trade values in the league don’t make sense. I assume this was the best offer or he would have taken a better offer. Why do teams value guys like Ristolainen and not Buch? Who knows.
Dog shit trade. Weekend ruined. It makes no sense unless there is a deal in place for a larger piece coming in.
I agree... Drury is overpaying though. Is it desperation? rookie mistakes? other GMs taking advantage either way.
top6 grind would be preferred though
I agree... Drury is overpaying though. Is it desperation? rookie mistakes? other GMs taking advantage either way.
top6 grind would be preferred though
I’d prefer depth in the form of three scoring lines, not a full bottom six if grinders, but clearly that isn’t Drurys planWe're not though... We have a absurd wealth of top6 talent. Our top6 on offense and defense is essentially set long term.
the much needed balancing is taking place.. It's much more expensive than we have anticipated
I dont think Steve comes around these boards much anymore but this point makes it sting more
Yeah - I wasn't gonna hitch our wagon to him over Kakko and Kravtsov. Always laughed when certain posters told me Buch was indispensable because "he's done it before and Kravtsov hasn't." Like, he's not THAT hard to replace.
But he's a 26 year old top 6 winger, and a positive player.
And this garbage is all we got?
This is some moron in our front office (Drury, Sather) is WAAAAAAAAY overvaluing "toughness," "grit," and "getting harder to play against."
That's what this is.
This is the Rangers stupidly overpaying for Blais, not that Buch couldn't have brought back more.
This is insanity.
F-.
This would be fireable if we had an owner who wasn't the one demanding these trades be made.
I would venture that the mindset is they already have a lot of the upper end talent in place or coming of age. They aren't necessarily wrong. But man we have to be able to extract more value than this. I don't care how targeted a player is. You maximize value.
The honest answer is yes that's a possibility.
Right now I see the Rangers trying to construct a bottom six with guys who have specific roles and attribiutes. So you're looking at Goodrow, Blais, {insert name}.
The idea itself isn't wrong or flawed. It's finding the right players and getting them at reasonable prices.
Now I understand why Drury said playoffs are not a mandate at the Gallant hiring presser.