1.5 years of Simmonds sounds pretty damn good to me. I want another Cup while Bergeron/Marchand/Rask/Krejci are still prime players, and before McAvoy gets a huge raise.
I don’t care if he’s considered a power play specialist. I know it’s unlikely but damn he’d be a get.
The more I read this, the more I agree. I think that 2 things are at play here for a lot of posters, myself included.
1. We fall in love with youth/prospects.
2. We sometimes forget how tough and grueling the playoffs are.
Regarding #1 --- it is probably impossible for every single player that is under age 22 that is in the organization to end up on the Bruins --- the numbers just don't work. Therefore, it makes sense to move 1-2 and a pick or prospect for a single player who is an upgrade at a position of need. LD or RW, currently, IMO.
Regarding #2 --- Simmonds is a warrior - he's tough, sticks up for teammates and seems to be a solid guy. In the playoffs, with so many young kids playing significant minutes, the importance of guys like that is invaluable. I often think back to a "Mic'd Up" segment that caught Igninla when he was here, trash talking a Hab, --- I clearly remember him saying to someone:
"What are you going to do?"
"What ARE YOU going to do?"
Things settled down pretty quickly after that.
A small thing, yes -- but can anyone here picture Bjork, Heinen, Debrusk or Grzelcyk saying that to some 8 year veteran and it having any impact at all? What if it were Simmonds in the same situation?
Look I love the kids --- and want them all to succeed, but I've also been around long enough to know that playing 80-120 NHL games over a nearly 9 month long season can wear down even the most in shape and energetic kid. There is so much that so many kids on this roster right now don't understand about NHL hockey, especially playoff hockey, that I'd feel a whole lot better if a guy like Simmonds were in it with them.