Bruins old and slow? Check the stats!

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,042
13,723
Vancouver
GMP_U2F2ZUdIMDE=.gif
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,891
15,573
Boston a team continually deemed old, slow with poor prospects are within top 3 youngest, tallest, and heaviest in the league. They are bigger and faster. Going to be interesting to see how this team performs moving forward. Good on Sweeney for keeping the team competitive and entertaining to watch.
Zadorov and Lindholm really made the Bruins younger and faster.
 

Bear of Bad News

"The Worst Guy on the Site" - user feedback
Sep 27, 2005
14,226
29,385
Boston a team continually deemed old, slow with poor prospects are within top 3 youngest, tallest, and heaviest in the league. They are bigger and faster. Going to be interesting to see how this team performs moving forward. Good on Sweeney for keeping the team competitive and entertaining to watch.

I mean, I'm glad you have this impression in your head because hey, whatever keeps you motivated, but I read damn near every post on the combined boards and I'm not sure where you're getting the impression from.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,579
20,797
Toronto, ON
A team that is sneaky old and slow are the Leafs, to be honest. It will be a good first round tussle again, but neither team gets much further than that.
 

Just Linda

Registered User
Feb 24, 2018
6,829
6,803
A team that is sneaky old and slow are the Leafs, to be honest. It will be a good first round tussle again, but neither team gets much further than that.

Could be said of any team that goes the top heavy route to roster building.

Oilers are the oldest team in the league, or at least were. Leafs are built from the same style of filling around the edges that made the Oilers slow.

Just a lot softer players.
 

PatriceBergeronFan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2011
61,706
40,417
USA
I mean, I'm glad you have this impression in your head because hey, whatever keeps you motivated, but I read damn near every post on the combined boards and I'm not sure where you're getting the impression from.
Odd because a majority of posts are indeed calling out the Bruins for being aging, declining, and slow... have been for years. Let alone the criticism of the prospects (warranted unless Lysell, Poitras, and Lohrei succeed).
 

Bear of Bad News

"The Worst Guy on the Site" - user feedback
Sep 27, 2005
14,226
29,385
Odd because a majority of posts are indeed calling out the Bruins for being aging, declining, and slow... have been for years. Let alone the criticism of the prospects (warranted unless Lysell, Poitras, and Lohrei succeed).

"Majority of posts" with a denominator of what? (Certainly not of all posts, so what's your sample?)

My guess is that you're falling victim to narrative bias.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,635
144,032
Bojangles Parking Lot
Pastrnak and McAvoy are old ?

McAvoy - 27
Pastrnak - 28
Swayman - 25

The only top player the old title remotely applies to is Marchand at 34

28’s aging for a winger. Not a lot of them maintain their peak past their late 20s.

This is also ignoring that they just shed a bunch of 30+ year olds over the summer, so obviously observations from the past won’t apply in the same way they used to.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad