Ziggy Stardust
Master Debater
Jack Johnson is not the type of defenseman the Kings need. That's like asking for another bonehead like McNabb in the lineup.
I'm guessing it means what Daly said, relatively flat , would be at or just above or below the current CAP.
http://www.todaysslapshot.com/from-the-ice/bettman-daly-expect-nhl-salary-cap-remain-flat/
And that shouldn't be a surprise, the CAnadian dollar was nosediving most of the year; they were hoping (FEb/Mar) that it would rebound, it didn't.
And it will have a huge effect on the Free Agents and the trades , teams trying to dump salary.
Article cites the Coyotes with 34 M in CAP space and Canes and Devils with 30.
Despite the soft Canadian dollar — which has now rebounded to 76 cents U.S. from its 13-year low of 68 cents in January — Bettman said he believes the NHL will set a revenue record this season.
And therein lies the 'problem' as well as a normal and fair concern of the cap era. Martinez, Muzzin, Doughty ARE the vets; they need the NEXT Muzzin, Toffoli, etc. Because the teams that are going deep are typically on that structure for the last 8-10 years--elite core, cheap and/or young auxillary parts that blow up.
The GOOD news with that is look where those guys came from. Muzzin was a UFA. Martinez was a 4th rounder. King. Nolan 7th. Toffoli 2nd. And so on.
The BAD news is there are no guarantees. Dowd, Mersch, Forbort, Gravel could be the next wave of cup champions or they could be the anchors that sink the ship and everything in between.
But the uncertainty is part of what makes it so fun (and maddening, lol, but you know). I guess I'm just saying I don't see it as the sky is falling, window slammed shut, whatever. I know it's wholly unlikely that we win ANOTHER cup, but it was ALSO wholly unlikely to win one period, never mind two in three years. Temper expectations and try to enjoy hockey for what it is again.
Comparing the 2012 team to the 2016 team is ********, Damacles, and you know it. We all saw how good they were post deadline, and we all believed they could beat the Canucks. And all the statistics were backing us up. It wasn't about a switch flip--they got Carter, which rounded out the top six, and Brown played way out of his depth for 40ish games.
We trashed the 2012 team pre-Carter trade because sans that trade they would have been fodder in the first round.
This 2016 team was an entirely different story. It's disingenuous of you to brush this off as one good team getting beat by a better team. You can't in one thread claim that the Kings were one of the worst teams in the playoffs, and here claim that they're still a good team needing a minor tweak or two. Which is it?
This 2016 team had the exact opposite trajectory of 2012--world beaters in October and November, no shows in March and April. Everything about this 2016 team was Opposite Day to the Kings teams we've seen do well over the past several years.
If the Sharks series goes down to the wire, maybe I'm singing a different tune. But that series wasn't even close. And if the gulf is that large between SC finalists and us, then no, a "few tweaks" won't close the gap.
There's a lot wrong with this team and that was clear when they were bleeding points down the stretch and pissing away leads. You can shrug this off if you want, but when your captain is getting his letter stripped after two championships, there's a problem.
I know this is all negative crap and that really rubs some people the wrong way, but it's how I see it. I'm not a rah rah cheerleader always believe kind of sports fan and I never have been. I'm not afraid to trash my team when they deserve it. Sometimes it's okay to call a spade a spade. The Kings have imploded two years in a row now. That's cause for concern, especially coming off Cup-WCF-Cup. We have too many major holes that we don't have the assets nor prospects to fill. This goes beyond just a roster tweak, IMO.
Muzzin/Martinez are the vets now. This is correct. Another possibility is to bring in the Scuderi/Mitchell/Regehr type vets, and move out the current vets for the new crop of Muzzin/Martinez/Toffoli's. Mitchell and Williams were both coming off injuries. Pick vets up on the cheap and use good returns to re-stock.
As far as the next batch of guys panning out. It's a numbers game. You don't know what will happen so now is the time to stock the cupboard back up. Maybe Lombardi feels he has enough coming from the Reign that he can make a signing or 2 and get back on track. We'll find out in a few weeks.
There's just not much out there though. If Lucic walks, the Kings could take runs at guys like Hamhuis and Eriksson and see what they are asking for, but outside of those two there isn't much that's impressive. I imagine both will command 5-6M.
The Kings could make a bit of space probably afford to grab Eriksson and a Liles type and go with rooks in the other spots. Demers might be a buy low guy, he looked like crap in the playoffs after that shoulder injury. He was pretty impressive early in the year.
Yea, Eriksson is a bad contract waiting to happen, but at least he's 30, right between Kopitar and Carter. Kopitar-Carter-Eriksson down the middle would give them a few more kicks at it before the wheels fall off.
Comparing the 2012 team to the 2016 team is ********, Damacles, and you know it. We all saw how good they were post deadline, and we all believed they could beat the Canucks.
lol, NOBODY thought the Kings could beat the President Trophy Canucks in 2012...including most of this board. Did you forget we were like 2 points from missing the playoffs to begin with? Puhlease.
1 * - Vancouver 82 51 22 9 111 43 8 7 27-10-4 24-12-5 249 198 +51 8-1-1 Won 1
2 y - St. Louis 82 49 22 11 109 45 4 10 30-6-5 19-16-6 210 165 +45 4-3-3 Won 1
3 y - Phoenix 82 42 27 13 97 36 6 10 22-13-6 20-14-7 216 204 +12 7-1-2 Won 5
4 x - Nashville 82 48 26 8 104 43 5 5 26-10-5 22-16-3 237 210 +27 6-4-0 Won 3
5 x - Detroit 82 48 28 6 102 39 9 3 31-7-3 17-21-3 248 203 +45 4-4-2 Lost 2
6 x - Chicago 82 45 26 11 101 38 7 7 27-8-6 18-18-5 248 238 +10 6-1-3 Won 1
7 x - San Jose 82 43 29 10 96 34 9 5 26-12-3 17-17-7 228 210 +18 7-3-0 Won 4
8 x - Los Angeles 82 40 27 15 [b]95[/b] 34 6 9 22-14-5 18-13-10 194 179 +15 5-2-3 Lost 2
e - Calgary 82 37 29 16 [b]90[/b] 34 3 9 23-12-6 14-17-10 202 226 -24 3-3-4 Won 2
e - Dallas 82 42 35 5 89 35 7 4 22-16-3 20-19-2 211 222 -11 3-7-0 Lost 5
e - Colorado 82 41 35 6 88 32 9 2 22-17-2 19-18-4 208 220 -12 3-5-2 Lost 2
e - Minnesota 82 35 36 11 81 24 11 9 20-17-4 15-19-7 177 226 -49 5-4-1 Lost 1
e - Anaheim 82 34 36 12 80 31 3 7 21-18-2 13-18-10 204 231 -27 4-5-1 Lost 1
e - Edmonton 82 32 40 10 74 27 5 7 18-17-6 14-23-4 212 239 -27 4-4-2 Lost 3
e - Columbus 82 29 46 7 65 25 4 5 17-21-3 12-25-4 202 262 -60 6-4-0 Won 2
Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story
Code:1 * - Vancouver 82 51 22 9 111 43 8 7 27-10-4 24-12-5 249 198 +51 8-1-1 Won 1 2 y - St. Louis 82 49 22 11 109 45 4 10 30-6-5 19-16-6 210 165 +45 4-3-3 Won 1 3 y - Phoenix 82 42 27 13 97 36 6 10 22-13-6 20-14-7 216 204 +12 7-1-2 Won 5 4 x - Nashville 82 48 26 8 104 43 5 5 26-10-5 22-16-3 237 210 +27 6-4-0 Won 3 5 x - Detroit 82 48 28 6 102 39 9 3 31-7-3 17-21-3 248 203 +45 4-4-2 Lost 2 6 x - Chicago 82 45 26 11 101 38 7 7 27-8-6 18-18-5 248 238 +10 6-1-3 Won 1 7 x - San Jose 82 43 29 10 96 34 9 5 26-12-3 17-17-7 228 210 +18 7-3-0 Won 4 8 x - Los Angeles 82 40 27 15 [b]95[/b] 34 6 9 22-14-5 18-13-10 194 179 +15 5-2-3 Lost 2 e - Calgary 82 37 29 16 [b]90[/b] 34 3 9 23-12-6 14-17-10 202 226 -24 3-3-4 Won 2 e - Dallas 82 42 35 5 89 35 7 4 22-16-3 20-19-2 211 222 -11 3-7-0 Lost 5 e - Colorado 82 41 35 6 88 32 9 2 22-17-2 19-18-4 208 220 -12 3-5-2 Lost 2 e - Minnesota 82 35 36 11 81 24 11 9 20-17-4 15-19-7 177 226 -49 5-4-1 Lost 1 e - Anaheim 82 34 36 12 80 31 3 7 21-18-2 13-18-10 204 231 -27 4-5-1 Lost 1 e - Edmonton 82 32 40 10 74 27 5 7 18-17-6 14-23-4 212 239 -27 4-4-2 Lost 3 e - Columbus 82 29 46 7 65 25 4 5 17-21-3 12-25-4 202 262 -60 6-4-0 Won 2
wow i totally forgot phoenix won the division that year...
There isn't a lot out there, but what do the Kings need? If they are looking at restocking/waiting a year/2 to get things back on track they need place holders and projects for next year. If it doesn't work out then the draft pick is higher.
One guy that might fit the bill could be Wisniewski. He missed pretty much all of last year with an injury. Carolina has a bunch of young D that played well last year. He also has a NMC so have to see how that works with the expansion draft. If the Kings were to move out Martinez, and get Wisniewski as a dump/project on the cheap it wouldn't be the end of the world.
Justin Schultz is another guy. He'd be another project. RFA, making 3.9M with a qualifying offer I doubt the Pens come up with. Could probably get him on a short term deal, 1-2 years, as I wouldn't say his role/salary has been defined. If it doesn't go well, the term is short and just dump him or wait out the contract. If he does well but isn't fitting in, flip him at the deadline for assets. If it pans out, keep him.
Then the other game. There may be some good young D available due to the expansion. Guys that are in a similar position to Gravel/Forbort that have shown more. If teams have 3-4 established D they may not be able to protect some nice defenders. Might be able to find some for some decent prices. Also if the Kings pick up guys on short term deals that'll expire, or something like a J.Schultz on a 2 year deal, those players won't need to be protected.
For example,
-trade Martinez for young assets/picks.
-pick up defender that it won't matter if expansion team takes them.
-target good young defenders that teams won't protect due to depth on D and Kings will be able to with an open spot.
Get assets from trade. Get additional assets for cheap that teams aren't in a position to protect.
Edit: Made possible because the Kings are going into a re-tool at the same time the expansion may be happening.
There isn't a lot out there, but what do the Kings need? If they are looking at restocking/waiting a year/2 to get things back on track they need place holders and projects for next year. If it doesn't work out then the draft pick is higher.
One guy that might fit the bill could be Wisniewski. He missed pretty much all of last year with an injury. Carolina has a bunch of young D that played well last year. He also has a NMC so have to see how that works with the expansion draft. If the Kings were to move out Martinez, and get Wisniewski as a dump/project on the cheap it wouldn't be the end of the world.
Justin Schultz is another guy. He'd be another project. RFA, making 3.9M with a qualifying offer I doubt the Pens come up with. Could probably get him on a short term deal, 1-2 years, as I wouldn't say his role/salary has been defined. If it doesn't go well, the term is short and just dump him or wait out the contract. If he does well but isn't fitting in, flip him at the deadline for assets. If it pans out, keep him.
Then the other game. There may be some good young D available due to the expansion. Guys that are in a similar position to Gravel/Forbort that have shown more. If teams have 3-4 established D they may not be able to protect some nice defenders. Might be able to find some for some decent prices. Also if the Kings pick up guys on short term deals that'll expire, or something like a J.Schultz on a 2 year deal, those players won't need to be protected.
For example,
-trade Martinez for young assets/picks.
-pick up defender that it won't matter if expansion team takes them.
-target good young defenders that teams won't protect due to depth on D and Kings will be able to with an open spot.
Get assets from trade. Get additional assets for cheap that teams aren't in a position to protect.
Edit: Made possible because the Kings are going into a re-tool at the same time the expansion may be happening.
Trouba might be on the trade block. Winnipeg needs a LHD and have a couple of RHD. Trouba is a RFA looking for around 5m+ and the Jets would probably rather have him around 4m.
So we offer Martinez++ for Trouba and then try to sign a veteran LHD like Yandle or let the young LHD dman we have play.
At the expansion draft we protect 8 and 1 with...
Kopitar, Carter, Toffoli, Pearson, Doughty, Muzzin, Trouba, Yandle (other UFA or Young D/F that breaks out) and Quick
Not the worst idea I've heard, it would hurt to lose Martinez though.
one of the many reasons we got our ***** handed to us was marty being hurt and yet he is still in all the trade plans .....some of you guys have already thrown in the towel on next year for sure and some have us going thru a closed window with bars , I would like to see how many were predicting our dynasty in the summer of 2014, master jinx by the way, and now 2 years latter and we may never win another series ****ing incredible, this is sports and we of all people should know nothing goes as easy as it should or as bleak as it seems after a loss. Try to get a grip we still have a very good core with 11,8,77,73,70,32,6,27 and a guy that if history repeats will have a comeback year in 12 , and if we get anything out of 23, 74,13 and 71 will be a plus even if it is in a trade pkg. . Not trying to be overly optimistic but around the middle of feb. in 2012 I was actually thinking of not renewing my seats or buying the playoffs because I didn't want to go thru vancouver fan arrogance again, i almost ended up in jail a couple of times lol, and we did not appear to be getting better then BOOM we are cup champs we have a few years left enjoy them GO KINGS GO
Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story
Code:1 * - Vancouver 82 51 22 9 111 43 8 7 27-10-4 24-12-5 249 198 +51 8-1-1 Won 1 2 y - St. Louis 82 49 22 11 109 45 4 10 30-6-5 19-16-6 210 165 +45 4-3-3 Won 1 3 y - Phoenix 82 42 27 13 97 36 6 10 22-13-6 20-14-7 216 204 +12 7-1-2 Won 5 4 x - Nashville 82 48 26 8 104 43 5 5 26-10-5 22-16-3 237 210 +27 6-4-0 Won 3 5 x - Detroit 82 48 28 6 102 39 9 3 31-7-3 17-21-3 248 203 +45 4-4-2 Lost 2 6 x - Chicago 82 45 26 11 101 38 7 7 27-8-6 18-18-5 248 238 +10 6-1-3 Won 1 7 x - San Jose 82 43 29 10 96 34 9 5 26-12-3 17-17-7 228 210 +18 7-3-0 Won 4 8 x - Los Angeles 82 40 27 15 [b]95[/b] 34 6 9 22-14-5 18-13-10 194 179 +15 5-2-3 Lost 2 e - Calgary 82 37 29 16 [b]90[/b] 34 3 9 23-12-6 14-17-10 202 226 -24 3-3-4 Won 2 e - Dallas 82 42 35 5 89 35 7 4 22-16-3 20-19-2 211 222 -11 3-7-0 Lost 5 e - Colorado 82 41 35 6 88 32 9 2 22-17-2 19-18-4 208 220 -12 3-5-2 Lost 2 e - Minnesota 82 35 36 11 81 24 11 9 20-17-4 15-19-7 177 226 -49 5-4-1 Lost 1 e - Anaheim 82 34 36 12 80 31 3 7 21-18-2 13-18-10 204 231 -27 4-5-1 Lost 1 e - Edmonton 82 32 40 10 74 27 5 7 18-17-6 14-23-4 212 239 -27 4-4-2 Lost 3 e - Columbus 82 29 46 7 65 25 4 5 17-21-3 12-25-4 202 262 -60 6-4-0 Won 2
I love love love love Martinez, but he wishes he had the ceiling Trouba does. Trouba is already the best version of Voynov and then some.
Doughty - Muzzin / Trouba - McNabb/Gravel means you can do whatever the **** you want with the last pairing and Trouba can step up just-in-case more so than Martinez can.
Ugh I hate the idea of giving Martinez up but I think a lot of people aren't seeing just how special Trouba could be, he was drawing comparisons to Drew his rookie year and though he stagnated a bit imagine our system w/him...
If we found a way to land Trouba (or even Barrie or hell, Myers/Buff) without giving up a core player, I'd consider this offseason a smashing success.
I love love love love Martinez, but he wishes he had the ceiling Trouba does. Trouba is already the best version of Voynov and then some.
Doughty - Muzzin / Trouba - McNabb/Gravel means you can do whatever the **** you want with the last pairing and Trouba can step up just-in-case more so than Martinez can.
Ugh I hate the idea of giving Martinez up but I think a lot of people aren't seeing just how special Trouba could be, he was drawing comparisons to Drew his rookie year and though he stagnated a bit imagine our system w/him...
If we found a way to land Trouba (or even Barrie or hell, Myers/Buff) without giving up a core player, I'd consider this offseason a smashing success.
Lets say we do get Trouba, wouldn't he be exposed in the expansion draft?
Lets say we do get Trouba, wouldn't he be exposed in the expansion draft?