Sacha Baron Corbin
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2011
- 12,544
- 481
Lol look how many people here still watch Raw live on a weekly basis. I wouldn't even do that if I had nothing else to do. Everyone will tune in for Goldberg.
Okay touché
Lol look how many people here still watch Raw live on a weekly basis. I wouldn't even do that if I had nothing else to do. Everyone will tune in for Goldberg.
Fans of Goldberg, like me!
I don't really care how they use their money. Old time stars like this will continue to be used and I still think Goldberg will draw. At least wait and see how it goes first before moaning and groaning about it.
Goldberg on Espn just said he hasn't talked to Vince since 2004.
http://www.cagesideseats.com/wwe/20...comeback-announced-brock-lesnar-vince-mcmahon
Whadawe have here.. a couple-a hata's, couple-a hata's
-everyone on HFW...because everyone here hates everything....everyone....incase nobody got the joke.......
Younger fan here, what are some good Goldberg matches to watch. I know I watched a match of his with Raven for the US title that I thought was great and another with DDP that I enjoyed. But that was just browsing YouTube. I'd like to watch his best stuff.
I saw how it goes 12 years ago. I won't spoil it for you aside from saying 2 guys in the crowd dressed as Hogan and Macho were more over with the crowd than Goldberg and Lesnar.
I was not happy about Sting showing up either. I said it would all be a rehashed WWE vs. WCW feud. I said Sting was too old to be working. Tell me, was I wrong?
So Goldberg at basically age 50 (DOB 12/27), who wrestled his last real match in 2004, is going to put on a good match out of the blue? I'm sure they can book it so, but it's not main event worthy. It also, as we discussed countless times, devalues the product from what it should be.
While they might see a small increase short-term, they'll lose long-term because all it does is **** all over the day-to-day performers who have to sit back and watch this garbage.
You're just another guy taking this way too serious. It's just wrestling bro. It's not a sport. It's entertainment. A one-time, one match deal with Goldberg with his cool entrance and his cool 3 moves will be fun to see. Add in whatever story they wanna go with is icing on the vegan cake.
If it's the main event, who cares? Why does the last match have to be the best? Just chill folks. Enjoy the ride. I know I will.
Toronto is a scary city to do that in. I could see Toronto absolutely ripping it apart. I thought I was i the vast minority of people who hate Goldberg, but am quite surprised to see how many people just don't want to see the guy based on his perception of the wrestling world. A lot of diehards, which are all that are left, are going to hold that against him the same way we all do. I'm not just going to forget his comments and his effort.
That's your opinion, and you are entitled to it. Personally I like your way of thinking, but realistically it's not actually that simple. It's an investment of time. Time is insanely valuable and WWE is asking for around 5-15 hours of your week.
So while I applaud the laid back way you are taking this, it's not realistic. There is a business, a product, entertainment value, time invested, money, a consumer, etc. So no... it's not just sitting back and enjoying it. These types of decisions have ramifications on their product and their fanbase.
Toronto is a scary city to do that in. I could see Toronto absolutely ripping it apart. I thought I was i the vast minority of people who hate Goldberg, but am quite surprised to see how many people just don't want to see the guy based on his perception of the wrestling world. A lot of diehards, which are all that are left, are going to hold that against him the same way we all do. I'm not just going to forget his comments and his effort.
It would be different if it was a guy Brock respected. He respects Taker and they won't out there and left a lot in the ring.
They two don't care at all for each other so no one is going to the extra to help the other look good.
He represents everything wrong with this body image in wrestling. Some guy was pushed based totally on his look, with zero care to actual wrestling.
Add his views on wrestling, and you got a flash in the pan jackass that didn't deserve the push he got.
goldberg got pushed like he did because he got overHe represents everything wrong with this body image in wrestling. Some guy was pushed based totally on his look, with zero care to actual wrestling.
Add his views on wrestling, and you got a flash in the pan jackass that didn't deserve the push he got.
goldberg got pushed like he did because he got over
Was Goldberg over-pushed? I would argue that he was underpushed.
Of course Goldberg deserved his push. He got over, simple as that. On the other hand, his career went downhill fast because he didn't have the talent to sustain his popularity.
Some in Toronto will pop for him no doubt, but a modern wrestling audience that ***** over Roman Reigns for being overpushed based on look is going to despise Goldberg.
My favourite WWE match of his was the elimination chamber at Summerslam 2003. He was so over in that arena and it was a real special kind of crowd reaction he got that night. He really should have won that match.
I think they were doing that because they thought he was there and wanted him to save the main event. It would've been a great reaction, but mainly because it would've been the surprise-return. They wanted to mark for the moment more than anything.the match will be fine, WM20 was a perfect storm, they were both leaving, and brock clearly did not want to risk injury since he was going to be trying out for football...it was what it was, but this one wont be the same
also i'd just like to remind people the smariest of smark fans in brooklyn, were chanting for goldberg when brock was beating the crap out of orton at summerslam