Why cuz we can’t question Gallagher’s production ??Some people on here deserve to be fans of the Buffalo Sabres.
Mathews and Mcdavid got questioned but Gallagher can’t. Lol
Why cuz we can’t question Gallagher’s production ??Some people on here deserve to be fans of the Buffalo Sabres.
No but players like Mathews , Mcdavid and marner can be questioned. Not Gallagher. Just ridiculousNever question Gallagher…
his salary won’t equal his play
Gallagher will never elevate come playoff time because of how he plays. He will always be injured with something or another. He’s been a great hab but the 6 year deal will suck assi think it's entirely possible to love how he competes and dislike the contract he's about to start.
There is very little chance that he's able to be a solid contributor for his cap cost for the duration... he just isn't good enough outside of his crash/bang approach to be very effective, and that approach is only going to be less and less effective as his body continues to break down.
Only real question is how many decent years we get out of him. Ladd is a good example... signs a 7 year deal @5.5, has 2 mediocre seasons (while bringing grit and leadership), then injuries & his play drops his impact so badly he winds up waiver fodder and minors burried by year 4 of his deal... anchor of a contract for the isles for 2 more years. Gally seems heading for a very similar fate.
People talkshiting against a guy that was playong injured, that was bleeding game after game for their team, can literally go puck themself hard.
stupid fans.
This is gonna be lucic and Ladd after 2 years. And I’m a Gallagher fan
I don't love the contract either, but it only becomes a problem if his play severely deteriorates in the first couple of seasons.i think it's entirely possible to love how he competes and dislike the contract he's about to start.
There is very little chance that he's able to be a solid contributor for his cap cost for the duration... he just isn't good enough outside of his crash/bang approach to be very effective, and that approach is only going to be less and less effective as his body continues to break down.
Only real question is how many decent years we get out of him. Ladd is a good example... signs a 7 year deal @5.5, has 2 mediocre seasons (while bringing grit and leadership), then injuries & his play drops his impact so badly he winds up waiver fodder and minors burried by year 4 of his deal... anchor of a contract for the isles for 2 more years. Gally seems heading for a very similar fate.
I don't love the contract either, but it only becomes a problem if his play severely deteriorates in the first couple of seasons.
I’m tired of hearing about the injury excuses. He simply f***ing suck. Utter trash. I’m so done with him.
We could have used a guy like Kucherov who was off the book because TB couldn't add him to the salary cap.Gallagher is as of now... the highest paid forward on the team for the next 6 years...
Why cuz we can’t question Gallagher’s production ??
Mathews and Mcdavid got questioned but Gallagher can’t. Lol
It's tough to produce when put in a shutdown role with linemates that are offensive black holes.
i think it's entirely possible to love how he competes and dislike the contract he's about to start.
There is very little chance that he's able to be a solid contributor for his cap cost for the duration... he just isn't good enough outside of his crash/bang approach to be very effective, and that approach is only going to be less and less effective as his body continues to break down.
Only real question is how many decent years we get out of him. Ladd is a good example... signs a 7 year deal @5.5, has 2 mediocre seasons (while bringing grit and leadership), then injuries & his play drops his impact so badly he winds up waiver fodder and minors burried by year 4 of his deal... anchor of a contract for the isles for 2 more years. Gally seems heading for a very similar fate.
Gallagher's positioning and puck battling ability is exceptionally strong. Getting into passing lanes, forcing turnovers, aggressive forecheck (aggressive insofar as positioning--not physicality) and generally just reading the play and seeing the ice--this is what has made Gallagher a very strong player. He's better known for taking abuse in front of the net, but his ability to see the ice and track the puck is second only to Corey Perry on the team. Those attributes are borderline elite from Gallagher. That's also what makes him so dangerous around the net; his superior ability to track the puck allows him to get to loose pucks faster than his opponents.
I don't expect this primary skill of Gallagher's to deteriorate with age. He's also never been fast. So I have some hope that he'll maintain a high level of play. That said, it's hard to disagree that $6.5m is an obscenely high price tag for a player whose body was already breaking down by the time he became a pro.
I think the disdain for Gallagher's play in these playoffs are wholly unwarranted. It seemed to me as though Gallagher was the superior defensive player on his unit; that he clogged up the neutral zone exceptionally well; led the team in its forcing turnovers and making breakouts for opposing D very difficult all playoffs long (up until the TB series); and Gallagher is often the player on his unit that leads the zone exit (he's very, very good at lobbing the puck up ice without triggering icing, but good enough to get a line change in). He's also very dependable to get the puck deep, keep plays simple, not turnover in the neutral zone, etc. Just a very, very smart, fundamentally strong player who sees the ice exceptionally well, and can hopefully help cement these fundamentals into players like Caufield going forward.