Brandon Duhaime/Connor Dewar or Marcus Foligno/Freddy Gaudreau

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Which group?

  • Duhaime/Dewar

    Votes: 6 33.3%
  • Foligno/Guadreau

    Votes: 10 55.6%
  • Neither

    Votes: 2 11.1%

  • Total voters
    18

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,521
1,662
If you had to pick - contracts and all (which I'll list below), which group of forwards would you have gone with:

Brandon Duhaime (2 years/3.7 million)
Connor Dewar (1 year/1.18 million)

vs

Marcus Foligno (4 year/16 million)
Frederick Gaudreau (5 years/10.5 million)
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,312
18,699
Really hard to overlook how bad the Foligno/Gaudreau contracts are
 

Digitalbooya

By order of the Peaky Blinders
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2010
27,492
7,685
Wisconsin
Gaudreau was at best in the same tier as Dewar and Duhaime last year, possibly worse.

Foligno is clearly better though.
Gaudreau was injured by Reaves. An injured Gaudreau played at the same level as them. I’m hoping for a nice bounce back.
Gaudreau was crap last year, and Foligno didn't play for 37 games. Throw in the AAV and terms of the contract, ages, and it's not even close, to me.
Foligno outproduced each of Dewar and Duhaime while playing 27* less games. Let that sink in. Dewar and Duhaime are fringe NHL players. Foligno is a 3rd line player that we hope has solved his injury problems.
 

saywut

Registered User
Jun 11, 2009
2,572
103
4 years was too many for Foligno and 4M is in line with his "peak" which he's passed.

After the year Freddy had he's basically on par with Boyd as a player, who was added on a 2-way. Was at least a reasonable rationale for this one at the time with a thought process to move on from Foligno and let Hartman walk rather than giving him ~5/30 but neither of those things happened and they ended up both extending.

So yeah, give me the other 2, though not really against the "neither" option as there's guys like Lauko who can be acquired for nothing, Lorentz is on a PTO in Toronto, Boyd on a 2-way, etc.

I reckon we could have Tarasenko, Glass, Lankinen, and a 3rd instead of Foligno, Gaudreau, Fleury, and Novak, even an additional asset if Foligno was traded last year. That's the group I'd prefer.
 

MNRube

Registered User
Oct 20, 2013
6,408
3,365
Foligno is a very valuable piece. Our team is soft as crap and he’s our 2nd best defensive forward. Gaudreau contract stinks but neither Duhaime & Dewar were more than run of the mill 4th liners
 
  • Like
Reactions: Digitalbooya

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,312
18,699
After the year Freddy had he's basically on par with Boyd as a player, who was added on a 2-way. Was at least a reasonable rationale for this one at the time with a thought process to move on from Foligno and let Hartman walk rather than giving him ~5/30 but neither of those things happened and they ended up both extending.

So yeah, give me the other 2, though not really against the "neither" option as there's guys like Lauko who can be acquired for nothing, Lorentz is on a PTO in Toronto, Boyd on a 2-way, etc.

Mostly unrelated to the thread but I like bringing in Boyd. At least with Arizona, he was a serviceable NHL player, way better than Lettieri and Lucchini. I don't know how he's going to fit in but I would be okay carrying him on the NHL roster full time, and he's spent time with Schmaltz and Keller so he knows how to play with skilled guys too if necessary.
 

BagHead

Registered User
Dec 23, 2010
6,973
3,870
Minneapolis, MN
I went with neither, not because I actually want neither of the groups, but because it's too close for me to choose one, as long as we're assuming everyone is and stays healthy. Foligno is the best player in the poll and he's paired with a guy who was, only as of last year, the worst player among them. They're overpaid, but Dewar and Duhaime are just warm bodies to me, despite all their speed and effort.

I don't know what the Wild would have done with the extra cap space. Would they have been able to retain Gustav Nyquist? If so, I'd rather have the cheaper grinders and Nyquist than the expensive best grinder. If they were going to blow that on garbage though, I'd rather have Foligno.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,418
21,301
MN
Add in that Foligno and Gaudreau are 6 years older than Duhaime and Dewar.

Prime Duhaime + Dewar + 3.1M AAV > Declining Foligno + Gaudreau + 5 extra man years of cap + NMC/NTC's
 
Last edited:

north21

Registered User
May 1, 2014
1,258
450
MN
Flush them all and see what ohgren and yurovbcan do. Yes know yurov is under contact but this os all fantasy anyway.
 

Digitalbooya

By order of the Peaky Blinders
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2010
27,492
7,685
Wisconsin
Add in that Foligno and Gaudreau are 6 years older than Duhaime and Dewar.

Prime Duhaime + Dewar + 3.1M AAV > Declining Foligno + Gaudreau + 5 extra man years of cap + NMC/NTC's
There’s a better argument for neither than to choose Dewar/Duhaime. If your argument is cap space, I’d rather have all of it than a couple lower tier 4th line players like those two. I don’t miss them and think the team is better without them.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad