Brady Tkachuk vs Mitch Marner

Who would you take on your team?

  • Brady Tkachuk

    Votes: 92 67.6%
  • Mitch Marner

    Votes: 44 32.4%

  • Total voters
    136

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
25,923
13,360
xGA/60
View attachment 926234

ixG/60 : Tkachuk 3rd with 1.38, Marner 314th with 0.63

Brady Tkachuk has underperformed his expected goals metrics every single year.
Marner has outperformed his every single year.

Also marner is at 0.84 goals/60 EV since 22-23???
View attachment 926239

Again, your numbers simply appear to be WRONG.
5 on 5
Under new coach Brady has better xGA/60,
Team wise good for sixth in the league today.

24/25


23/24 until today

22/23 until today
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Xspyrit

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,605
10,511
Montreal, Canada

You're set up on 5v5 :rolleyes:

ixG/60 : Tkachuk 3rd with 1.38, Marner 314th with 0.63

Brady Tkachuk has underperformed his expected goals metrics every single year.
Marner has outperformed his every single year.

Is it supposed to be a negative? Tkachuk's game is exhausting for opposing D-men and goalies

He is a volume shooter/everything. He keeps coming at you until it goes in.

Also marner is at 0.84 goals/60 EV since 22-23???
View attachment 926239

Again, your numbers simply appear to be WRONG.

My numbers come from Natural Stat Trick. I don't know where you're taking this but it's not even on the same filters as in your first table... lol
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,212
2,783
You're set up on 5v5 :rolleyes:



Is it supposed to be a negative? Tkachuk's game is exhausting for opposing D-men and goalies

He is a volume shooter/everything. He keeps coming at you until it goes in.



My numbers come from Natural Stat Trick. I don't know where you're taking this but it's not even on the same filters as in your first table... lol
Screenshot 2024-11-04 at 9.09.12 PM.png


A) I'd recommend using evolving hockey
B) if you are using NST, use 5v5. NST includes empty net situations in their EV numbers

Which in this case is what is skewing the totals massively.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad