Brady Tkachuk vs Mitch Marner

Who would you take on your team?

  • Brady Tkachuk

    Votes: 54 62.8%
  • Mitch Marner

    Votes: 32 37.2%

  • Total voters
    86

Sasha Orlov

Lord of the Manor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2018
8,788
20,689
My fav part of these threads are holding Marner accountable for only being PPG in the playoffs while ignoring Brady can't sniff the playoffs and assuming if he got there he will be a playoff GOAT.
Marner is not ppg in the playoffs though
 

Korpse

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
20,925
9,799
I'm talking about xGoals for in this specific section, not share.

You claimed Tkachuk's netfront prescense would create better quality chances for his teammates that the models cannot pick up.

I showed you that this has not been the case. If it was the case, Tkachuk's teammates would be outscoring their expected goals metrics. They have not.

The discussion started with you mentioning his goal share would drop. Yes it’s likely as it’s an element that is not accounted for in xG. Your making big assumption that the models test at 100% we know that they do not. xG is a measure of individual unblocked shot attempts. Subtracting a players ixG from their on ice xG to determine their value to their linemates is so far beyond its design and an egregious misuse of stats. It’s insane.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,958
2,569
The discussion started with you mentioning his goal share would drop. Yes it’s likely as it’s an element that is not accounted for in xG. Your making big assumption that the models test at 100% we know that they do not. xG is a measure of individual unblocked shot attempts. Subtracting a players ixG from their on ice xG to determine their value to their linemates is so far beyond its design and an egregious misuse of stats. It’s insane.
Blatant mischaracterization of what I've said but sure.

I claimed Brady Tkachuk is a poor finisher based on him consistently underperforming his INDIVIDUAL expected goal metrics.

I have also pointed out his struggles in terms of generating quality offensive chances this year. I have also acknowledged his excellence in this area in previous years

You then claimed the models overrate Brady Tkachuk's individual chance quality, but underrate his teammates chance quality with him based on his "netfront prescence".

So those are 2 claims.

I responded to both:

With your claim that the models are overrating his individual chance quality, I said, sure, let's go with that assumption. In that case, his chance generation is worse than I had previously thought, and his on ice xGoals share is inflated by your own admission. If a "perfect" model should value brady tkachuks chances less, then the share of quality chances ottawa gets with him on the ice is less than the current models show. Simple. He can be a better finisher and worse play driver than I previously thought if that makes you happy.

Claim B: Brady Tkachuk's netfront prescense causes these models to underrate the quality of chances of his teammates when he's on the ice.

I disproved this claim by showing, that throughout his career, Brady Tkachuk's teammates have NOT outperformed what the models say their chances should generate in terms of goals.


At no point did I ascertain Tkachuk's value to his linemates in this. I simply disproved the claim that Brady Tkachuk's netfront presence is causing expected goals models to underrate the quality of his teammates chances with him on the ice.
 

geebster

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2019
2,062
3,201
Im not Leafs fan and I absolutely have a lot of questions about how Marner has played when it's mattered but ... these two players aren't in the same class or tier. Marner is clearly better.

Unless you bring in contracts or a specific scenario where your team already has a lot of soft skill and needs
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad