Brady Tkachuk vs Alexis Lafreniere

Who’s better?


  • Total voters
    158
Status
Not open for further replies.

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,651
16,609
Vancouver
BT's put up back to back to back 30G+ season's. But, 30% of his production comes on the PP. I'd assume Laf would put up similar production if he was getting the same ice time, but he's nowhere as physical. Laf has a slightly higher offensive ceiling, but Brady's better.

Their 5v5 scoring is essentially the same since the start of last year so I guess the question is whether Laf would produce as much in those PP minutes. Brady has been good but not so efficient on the PP that it’s unreasonable to expect Laf to match it, but so far Laf hasn’t produced well in his PP minutes at all. Only 10 points in 225 minutes the past three years. Though not much of that has been on the first unit
 

GreatSaveEssensa

The Dark Side Of The Goon
Feb 16, 2016
3,744
6,044
Manitoba
As of today the answer is Brady. But Brady is also 2 yrs older. In two more seasons I really think a case could be made for Alexis
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
35,703
36,924
NJ
Their 5v5 scoring is essentially the same since the start of last year so I guess the question is whether Laf would produce as much in those PP minutes. Brady has been good but not so efficient on the PP that it’s unreasonable to expect Laf to match it, but so far Laf hasn’t produced well in his PP minutes at all. Only 10 points in 225 minutes the past three years. Though not much of that has been on the first unit

You also can’t just compare their 5v5 scoring and not acknowledge that Laf’s been stapled to Panarin. Tkachuk also has the better 5v5 P/60 while having a lower secondary assist rate.

2.36 vs 2.17. Primary pt rate is 2.07 vs 1.77
 
  • Like
Reactions: MakoSlade

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,651
16,609
Vancouver
You also can’t just compare their 5v5 scoring and not acknowledge that Laf’s been stapled to Panarin. Tkachuk also has the better 5v5 P/60 while having a lower secondary assist rate.

2.36 vs 2.17. Primary pt rate is 2.07 vs 1.77

The rates are better but the difference in actual minutes and performance are so minor I didn’t bother mentioning it. Tkachuk has played about 70 fewer minutes and has 2 more 5v5 points, and 5 more 5v5 primary points. I’d say it’s within typical variance range, though Tkachuk has the better track record anyway so it’s probably giving Laf the benefit of the doubt too much. Panarin is a factor as well (though Stutzle is no slouch), so it probably all adds up in Tkachuk’s favour.
 
Last edited:

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,155
26,869
New York
You also can’t just compare their 5v5 scoring and not acknowledge that Laf’s been stapled to Panarin. Tkachuk also has the better 5v5 P/60 while having a lower secondary assist rate.

2.36 vs 2.17. Primary pt rate is 2.07 vs 1.77
I think playing with Panarin also hurts Laf's defensive numbers. That guy is a terrible defensive influence. I think it has made Lafreniere play worse defense because he sees the example of Panarin being able to play no defense because he's one of the best offensive players in the league.
 

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
11,174
8,197
Brampton, ON
I think playing with Panarin also hurts Laf's defensive numbers. That guy is a terrible defensive influence. I think it has made Lafreniere play worse defense because he sees the example of Panarin being able to play no defense because he's one of the best offensive players in the league.

How long has that been the case?

Wasn't he quite good defensively and offensively in '19-'20 playing with lackluster linemates? IIRC, some had him in the Hart conversation that year.

He has become more one-dimensional since then?
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,155
26,869
New York
How long has that been the case?

Wasn't he quite good defensively and offensively in '19-'20 playing with lackluster linemates? IIRC, some had him in the Hart conversation that year.

He has become more one-dimensional since then?
He was good defensively in the sense that he literally always had the puck, so he didn't ever have to play any defense. He's always been low effort with back-checking and stuff like that.

He's not that dominant at controlling play now. Still a great offensive player with what he can do for scoring and assisting goals, but hasn't retained the possession tilting ability he had at his best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DitchMarner

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
13,068
19,287
He was good defensively in the sense that he literally always had the puck, so he didn't ever have to play any defense. He's always been low effort with back-checking and stuff like that.

He's not that dominant at controlling play now. Still a great offensive player with what he can do for scoring and assisting goals, but hasn't retained the possession tilting ability he had at his best.

It’s also weird how much it’s purposeful- they’ll have him cheating at the blue line, just trying to time the breakout instead of a full 5-v-5 effort to regain control, then head up ice.

Anywho, Chunk wins.
 

gritdash60

Registered User
Aug 9, 2022
1,519
1,554
Behind the net
We out here comparing a player who has 3 30+ goal seasons to one who might get one in the future.

Edit: and not only that, a PPG season also meanwhile the counterpart has a injury-per-game seasons
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad