DackellDuck
Registered User
- Sep 20, 2024
- 348
- 554
Well, we'll find out soon enough if this guy is just trolling for clicks.
He also came back in the Pittsburgh game...
Well, we'll find out soon enough if this guy is just trolling for clicks.
He also came back in the Pittsburgh game...
We needed a fighter in the lineup.Er, if he dislocated his shoulder against the Penguins, why the hell was he playing against Montreal?
I'm skeptical that if Tkachuk had partially dislocated his shoulder on that play the Senators would have dressed him in the very next pre-season game.
I'm also skeptical of any doctor who's trying to get more Twitter followers by diagnosing injuries based on videos and trying to get his own hashtag to trend. Especially a family physician...
But there was supposed to be an update TODAY, damn it.
This is the same doctor who said Laine would be out for 4-6 months. I wouldn't worry too much.Er, if he dislocated his shoulder against the Penguins, why the hell was he playing against Montreal?
This is the same doctor who said Laine would be out for 4-6 months. I wouldn't worry too much.
He said it could be one of 4 things and he was right about one of them. Seeing what appears to be Tkachuk hurting his right shoulder two games in a row is quite concerning. No updates today makes me think they're looking for a second opinion or waiting for more tests/results.This is the same doctor who said Laine would be out for 4-6 months. I wouldn't worry too much.
He said it could be one of 4 things and he was right about one of them. Seeing what appears to be Tkachuk hurting his right shoulder two games in a row is quite concerning. No updates today makes me think they're looking for a second opinion or waiting for more tests/results.
Agreed. We'll see what happens.If Travis Green comes out and says that "he doesn't think that any are serious" and then it turns out that Tkachuk needs shoulder surgery, it's a pretty big blow to his credibility with the press at the very beginning of his tenure.
If I were one of his patients, I might start thinking about other options.
Isn't Laine out for 2-3 months? That's not wildly off considering he's only diagnosing off of a video. That's not to say he's correct or that what he's doing is even appropriate to begin with but dismissing him completely seems pretty out of place too.This is the same doctor who said Laine would be out for 4-6 months. I wouldn't worry too much.
I doubt the guy is an actual doctor.This is the same doctor who said Laine would be out for 4-6 months. I wouldn't worry too much.
Well considering he was at 4-6 months originally. He was off by 100%Isn't Laine out for 2-3 months? That's not wildly off considering he's only diagnosing off of a video. That's not to say he's correct or that what he's doing is even appropriate to begin with but dismissing him completely seems pretty out of place too.
Isn't Laine out for 2-3 months? That's not wildly off considering he's only diagnosing off of a video. That's not to say he's correct or that what he's doing is even appropriate to begin with but dismissing him completely seems pretty out of place too.
Diagnosing it off of a video...dismiss it all you want but that's not far off considering he didn't do a physical evaluation. Also, if Laine's recovery ends up being 3 months and the low end of his diagnosis was 4 months, that's not 100% off.Well considering he was at 4-6 months originally. He was off by 100%
Do it?I mean, I have no professional medical knowledge and I said "out for a few months" the first time I saw the hit on Laine.
I should start a twitter account.
Diagnosing it off of a video...dismiss it all you want but that's not far off considering he didn't do a physical evaluation. Also, if Laine's recovery ends up being 3 months and the low end of his diagnosis was 4 months, that's not 100% off.
Right....You're giving the guy credit for what was obvious to everyone watching the game.
He said surgery was required. It wasn't.
Now he's saying Tkachuk requires surgery. Let's see if he goes 0 for 2.
Right....
He was way off.... What is even going on here haha. Anyone could have said a random time frame and they wouldnt have been far off. As there is no actual definition of 'far off'.
I'm not giving him credit for anything, though. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense to completely dismiss his evaluation. Also, if you really wanna discuss what he actually said about the Laine situation, he laid out multiple potential injuries and their recovery timelines. I didn't see him anywhere say that he believed with certainty it was any of the 4 possibilities.You're giving the guy credit for what was obvious to everyone watching the game.
He said surgery was required. It wasn't.
Now he's saying Tkachuk requires surgery. Let's see if he goes 0 for 2.
He could be completely wrong about this. You know how we know? Because he's not doing physical evaluations or looking over any imaging. He's giving educated guesses. Feel free to dismiss him but an educated guess is significantly better than reckless speculation.I believe Tkachuk either dislocated or partially dislocated his shoulder here and he likely did the same thing tonight
If this is happening this easily, can be concerning as may require surgery to repair the labrum (5+ months out)