topshelf15
Registered User
- May 5, 2009
- 27,993
- 6,005
Tkachuk is the pointy end of the spear,every team that has won anything went into battle with a sharp spear
Brady Tkachuk is exactly what the Leafs need right now but don't have any of "it", even on their 4th line.Brady Tkachuk is a bad skater; Brady Tkachuk cannot stay on his skates; Brady Tkachuk cannot dangle; Brady Tkachuk is not a sniper; Brady Tkachuk is not fast; Brady Tkachuk is not a great passer.
However...
Brady Tkachuk comes to play; Brady Tkachuk scores goals, Brady Tkachuk lives in the opposing goalies crease, Brady Tkachuk is not afraid to take a stick to the head; Brady Tkachuk is a threat; Brady Tkachuk does what other players will not do; Brady Tkachuk creates space for his teammates, Brady Tkachuk is not afraid to get hurt, Brady Tkachuk is an NHL coach's dream; Brady Tkachuk is the definition of "go to the net and good things will happen".
Brady Tkachuk is exactly what this team needs; Brady Tkachuk is the player that this team has been lacking since inception. Brady Tkachuk would have beat the Leafs in playoffs past, Brady Tkachuk was the perfect pick for this team.
He needs to learn how to score away from the crease and make some plays for his line mates. Right now he’s looking like a future complimentary player in the top six.
He needs to learn how to score away from the crease and make some plays for his line mates. Right now he’s looking like a future complimentary player in the top six.
Ya not looking too good for a 4th overall pickHe needs to learn how to score away from the crease and make some plays for his line mates. Right now he’s looking like a future complimentary player in the top six.
Looking a helluva lot better than the Zadina or Wahlstrom or several of the other eligibles at that time that people favored over him,Ya not looking too good for a 4th overall pick
dobson was my guy. I would have also loved hughes.Looking a helluva lot better than the Zadina or Wahlstrom or several of the other eligibles at that time that people favored over him,
Lol, wut?
he doesnt think a player who might only top out as a complimentary player instead of a line driver should be picked top 4.
its a fair assessment.
he doesnt think a player who might only top out as a complimentary player instead of a line driver should be picked top 4.
its a fair assessment.
it's still pretty early but my initial thought has always been that #4 was too high for tkachuk considering some of the players that were still on the board. Brady has been pretty much exactly what I expected, but with better passing ability. It will take a couple more years to how zadina, dobson, hughes, etc progress, but right now my initial assessment is still valid.he doesnt think a player who might only top out as a complimentary player instead of a line driver should be picked top 4.
its a fair assessment.
complementary doesn't equal passenger. Tkachuk works extremely hard and has great drive.Sure, it’s a fair assessment in general, but it’s not a fair assessment of BT currently, or his potential.
He is hardly a passenger on whatever line he’s on, and he often enough carries the puck into the offensive zone to make plays.
Hughes and Dobson are not better NHL players than BT is right now, in my opinion, so I’m not sure why some folks try and put down our guy while pretending the other two have done anything so far to gain higher praise.
It surprising really.
If Brady turns out to be equal or better than Mathew that would be great. Unfortunately, Mathew is looking like the much more skilled player and is cerebral.Brady Tkachuk is far from just a complimentary player. He reached 25 career goals in less games than both his father and his brother Matthew and both those players are/were considered top line players.
Brady is such a unique player that you really cannot simply label him to a specific category because he such a multi-faceted and intriguing player. He can do it all, and just because he is not a flash and dash type player does not make him unworthy of being picked 4th overall. He had 22 goals and 45 points in 71gp as a rookie, those are not "complimentary" player numbers; to clarify I am not seeing he is elite offensively but you would be hard pressed to find a player drafted outside the top 3 who had "elite" numbers (70+) in their rookie year. Those are usually reserved for elite 1st overall picks like Crosby,
he doesnt think a player who might only top out as a complimentary player instead of a line driver should be picked top 4.
its a fair assessment.
If Brady turns out to be equal or better than Mathew that would be great. Unfortunately, Mathew is looking like the much more skilled player and is cerebral.
Do you think Brady has the abilities to create more offence? Right now his goal scoring comes almost exclusively in the crease from tap in and deflections. He doesn’t strike me as a guy that can carry his line mates either.
Brady Tkachuk is exactly what the Leafs need right now but don't have any of "it", even on their 4th line.
dobson was my guy. I would have also loved hughes.
wahlstrom at 4 would have been just bad. Zadina doesn't look too great right now, but i did like him at the time tbh.
He needs to learn how to score away from the crease and make some plays for his line mates. Right now he’s looking like a future complimentary player in the top six.
Brady Tkachuk is far from just a complimentary player. He reached 25 career goals in less games than both his father and his brother Matthew and both those players are/were considered top line players.
Brady is such a unique player that you really cannot simply label him to a specific category because he such a multi-faceted and intriguing player. He can do it all, and just because he is not a flash and dash type player does not make him unworthy of being picked 4th overall. He had 22 goals and 45 points in 71gp as a rookie, those are not "complimentary" player numbers; to clarify I am not seeing he is elite offensively but you would be hard pressed to find a player drafted outside the top 3 who had "elite" numbers (70+) in their rookie year. Those are usually reserved for elite 1st overall picks like Crosby, Ovechkin, Kane, etc.
Here are some examples of forwards drafted 4th overall and the number of points in their rookie season:
2004- Andrew Ladd, CAR, 11 pts in 29 games followed by 21 pts in 65 games
2005- Benoit Pouliot, MIN, 18 points in 65 games over 4 seasons before being traded to MTL.
2006- Nik Backstrom, WSH, 69 pts in 82 gp.
2009- Evander Kane, ATL, 26 pts in 66 gp
2010- Ryan Johansen, CLB, 21 pts in 67 gp
2014- Sam Bennett, CGY, 36 pts in 77 gp
2015- Mitch Marner, TOR, 61 pts in 77gp
2016- Jesse Puljujarvi, EDM, 8 pts in 28 gp (40 pts in 139 gp over three seasons)
The years I skipped were due to a defenseman being selected as I felt it is better to compare him to other forwards and again, the facts tell a different story. Since 2004 there have only been two forwards who had arguably elite rookie seasons (Backstrom and Marner) and no other player comes close to them...except for Brady Tkachuk. Am I suggesting he is on their level, no, but what I am suggesting is that people lower their expectations just because he was a 4th overall pick.