I know. I just don't think what he did in Calgary is relevant when discussing his work in Toronto.
That's like saying Babcock did a great job here because he won the Cup.
Well comparing a GM to a coach isnt the same.
I was just replying back to your question.
Tre was caught in a situation in Calgary. It may not been all his fault but that’s the position he was in.
It’s like here. He did the exact same thing as Dubas did with Mathews and Willy extensions and he also gave them NMC
The excuse the standard was set beforehand is hogwash IMHO.
Is what Berube did in St. Louis revelant ? as Babcock as you mentioned? Are we giving him the benefit of the doubt because he won a cup?
We already see posts that the core is the problem and no one has mentioned that maybe trying to put a square peg (players) into a round hole (Berube system) isn’t quite working out.
The GM job is to get coaches and players he has to be on the same page. Put them in the best position to succeed. I know they want to be more physical and harder to play against but so far and it’s still very early .,,,it doesn’t seem like Mathew’s etc are adopting to the new system.
I wouldn’t have Mathew’s on the PK
PP ineptness is a big issue also. NHL is a specialty league now to go along with the gimmick 3 vs 3 in OT.
We have a supposedly better D and goaltending. Our top 6 continue to struggle with scoring and our bottom 6 has been pretty pathetic except for a bright spot in Lorentz.
Tre did resign Kampf and Lilly. Gave Reaves a 3 yr deal at 1.35 mil a yr which every day looks like bad signings.
Like mentioned it’s still early. Trades will happen and hopefully it will be for players who fit the scheme.