Confirmed Trade: [BOS/ANA] Ondrej Kase for David Backes (25% retained), Axel Andersson, and 2020 1st round pick

b in vancouver

Registered User
Jul 28, 2005
7,863
5,720
Agreed, it's a known but substantial risk taken by Boston. This trade has the possibility to look horrid for either team depending on Kase's health and the prospects/pick. Hopefully it ends up working out for everyone.

Win-Win trades are my favourite - especially with teams I like, like Anaheim. The kid and pick are one thing, we'll see, but I honestly believe that Backes will help your team next year.
 

Trap Jesus

Registered User
Feb 13, 2012
28,686
13,458
I don't think the Backes contract is as bad as people are making it out. It's going to cost Anaheim less than 3 million for one year with the retention. If they can get anything out of Backes next year, that's not much money. Plenty of guys making much worse for much longer. And they have the cap space
It's tough for a contract to get much worse. He was a massively disappointing player his first 2 years (I'd call him a bad middle 6 guy even if his point production looked passable), not NHL caliber the next 2, and then has one year left after this. A $6 million contract for a player like that can sewer a team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SPV

paine

Registered User
Jun 4, 2007
6,915
168
This thread makes my brain hurt. No pun intended.

The Ducks will pay Backes $3M next season, his cap hit is irrelevant. He’s a non factor in this trade from the Ducks perspective.

The Ducks traded Kase for a late 1st round pick and a prospect. And did the Bruins a solid by taking back a large cap hit.

I love Kase, but I’m worried he won’t last much longer in the NHL. He’s coming back from another concussion - at some point his brain won’t hold up if he keeps getting concussed.

Kase is an energizer bunny, he’s creative, and he’s great at controlling the puck. He’s also young and on a good contract.

Kase is the type of player I’d trade a 1st round pick and a prospect for if he was healthy, but his history of concussions is too big of a gamble.

Fingers crossed he can stay in the lineup, not for the sake of the Bruins, but for the sake of his future off the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b in vancouver

jetsforever

Registered User
Dec 14, 2013
28,030
24,525
Backes only has 1 year left
Not sure who Andersson is but Anaheim better hope he's good to replace Kase
 

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,653
3,273
This is a much better deal than getting Faulk....

Bruins already have a weak farm due their NHL success. Yet, they didn’t send a Top 10 player and free cap space to extend their young players? They also got a good player.

I’m not a Bruins fan, but admit this was a brilliant deal.
 

bov

Registered User
Nov 13, 2010
7,376
3,535
Kase is a great fit for Boston, and nice haul for Anaheim. Looks like a win-win if he can stay healthy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blowfish

scorpiorising

Registered User
May 25, 2011
357
323
How many concussions has Kase had?
2015 (ahl)
2017
2018
2020

Am I missing any? Looking at an old thread on reddit they said he had 4 in like 2017 or 2018 already.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,274
10,193
Kase is a good player who will fit Boston's system well. His sh% is super low but he's still generating his relatively normal underlying numbers.

We're building for 3 years from now so it makes sense to trade him. Backes is irrelevant the deal is basically a 1st and a prospect which is fine
 

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,653
3,273
The trade makes sense for both teams. There is no shame in having a win-win deal.

Bruins needed to free cap space and they dumped their biggest problem for a bottom 1st + C Level prospect. They also got a good player for the next 1.5 years RFA they can easily release due to injuries.

This was a substantial win for the Bruins and can’t believe other teams weren’t involved that could have beaten this deal.
 

SPV

Zoinks!
Sponsor
Feb 4, 2003
11,361
6,243
New Hampshire
hfboards.com
It's tough for a contract to get much worse. He was a massively disappointing player his first 2 years (I'd call him a bad middle 6 guy even if his point production looked passable), not NHL caliber the next 2, and then has one year left after this. A $6 million contract for a player like that can sewer a team.

It was terrible for us, I agree. But for a team like Anaheim in this trade, they basically bought a 1st round pick for less than 3 million dollars and a potentially good, but potentially damaged, young player.
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,070
5,981
Visit site
Bruins needed to free cap space and they dumped their biggest problem for a bottom 1st + C Level prospect. They also got a good player for the next 1.5 years RFA they can easily release due to injuries.

This was a substantial win for the Bruins and can’t believe other teams weren’t involved that could have beaten this deal.

Well, you're sort of ignoring the Ducks side of things. Kase was constantly injured and has had multiple concussions. Boston is willing to roll the dice on his health and the Ducks weren't. The Backes contract is no issue for the Ducks. So basically they traded a player they didn't trust anymore for a player they can easily afford, a late 1st, and a prospect that is certainly a bit better than you are portraying him. Getting a 20 year old RHD is good for the Ducks since they have literally no depth at right defense. Someone above, in fact, thought he's been the best D in the Q this year.
 

Trap Jesus

Registered User
Feb 13, 2012
28,686
13,458
It was terrible for us, I agree. But for a team like Anaheim in this trade, they basically bought a 1st round pick for less than 3 million dollars and a potentially good, but potentially damaged, young player.
Oh yeah, for them it's fine when they aren't contending. There was some hope for them going into this year for a decent season, but after seeing how their team performed there's no issue just taking an extra $1.9 million onto the cap (Backes minus Kase's salary) for a 1st and a prospect, especially considering they're only paying an extra $400k to do so next year (Backes is only owed $4 million, so the Ducks just have to pay him $3 million).
 
  • Like
Reactions: SPV

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,051
11,251
It was terrible for us, I agree. But for a team like Anaheim in this trade, they basically bought a 1st round pick for less than 3 million dollars and a potentially good, but potentially damaged, young player.
Ducks could opt to buy out backes.

since Boston is covering 25%, the ducks would pay $750k in signing bonus plus 2/3 of $2.25 mill in salary. But they would then have to take the $2 mill of salary over cap hit that Backes has been paid. So rather than have him on the roster for $4.5 mill cap wise a buyout would mean around a $3.5 mill dead cap him so replacing him with a roster spot would equal the same $4.5 mill cap hit if the opted for someone young. Then they have a $715 dead cap the following year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SPV

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,190
18,978
North Andover, MA
Just catching up on radio for the day; proving once again hes the best in the business, Bob McKenzie made an off hand remark linking the Bruins and Kase about 5 minutes before the trade was announced.

He didnt say a deal was imminent, just said the Bruins are looking at wingers and included Kase's name.

I mean he is but Boston and Anaheim have been linked for months.
 

Number8

Registered User
Oct 31, 2007
18,847
19,288
no for the reasons I stated.
The core was watching and you can be assured they would know where DB didnt want to go.
So no I dont believe for a second ‘wherever’ was on the table.
To Wally’s point, when Backes was “sent” to Providence the Bruins room, including its leaders, were very vocal about how strongly the felt about Backes as a teammate and friend. Business is business, but there is little doubt that Bruins players had a vested interest with Backes being treated respectfully as a vet that, while bitterly disappointed to not dress in SCF G7, said he’d waive the Pom poms and do whatever else he could to root his teammates on.

Backes and Sweeney handled a difficult situation with class. That, and leaders like Chara and Bergeron, is very likely why Boston players don’t tend to try and milk every penny out of every deal.

I don’t for a second think Boston presented Backes with any ultimatums. I suspect quite the opposite.

Good luck DB42. You’re a class act and a warrior. Young players in Anaheim just got a massive benefit in obtaining a veteran presence in the room who has and will continue to mentor young players to be best they can.
 

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,653
3,273
Well, you're sort of ignoring the Ducks side of things. Kase was constantly injured and has had multiple concussions. Boston is willing to roll the dice on his health and the Ducks weren't. The Backes contract is no issue for the Ducks. So basically they traded a player they didn't trust anymore for a player they can easily afford, a late 1st, and a prospect that is certainly a bit better than you are portraying him. Getting a 20 year old RHD is good for the Ducks since they have literally no depth at right defense. Someone above, in fact, thought he's been the best D in the Q this year.

Ducks could easily gotten more.

They inherited a massive cap dump in return for a bottom 1st + low level prospect. A trade for simply a 2nd would have better deal which most teams would have easily offered.

ANA is projected to have nearly $10M next season, $3.5M is wasted on Backes considered among the most untradeable players with a NMC.
 

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad