For those paying attention: this is nonsense. Phil claimed to be "under 50" and when clear examples of him claiming to be much older were presented, he had to make up the story you see above. Later last night, he came clean, privately recanting this entire thing, claiming he was just "punking" us and he's the same Big Phil he's always been since 2003. But I wasn't born yesterday - I knew there was more to this.
The truth is that he is not the wise, old fan who saw Esposito's whole career. He saw none of it, actually. Phil has been on these boards between the ages of 23 and 42, while pretending to be approximately 20-30 years older than that the entire time. When he took exception to me saying he was "in his 50s" two nights ago, and told me he was not actually that old, he was telling the truth, and broke character to do so. This whole thing about "playing a prank" is a lame attempt at saving face.
Why change your story back to save face? This is why: In 2009, Phil wrote a book.
(seriously man, good for you). You may be wondering, why are you just hearing now that Phil wrote a book? If you were in this section in 2009 you may have seen
a thread where Phil promoted this book, as though it was written by someone other than him. You must be wondering:
If I wrote a book, I wouldn't be able to stop myself from promoting it in the HOH section and taking credit! Yeah, I think a lot of us would feel the same. But a lot of us aren't pretending to be someone else. Phil knew that if he took credit for writing the book, we would all find out he was just 29.
@Felidae explained quite eloquently why this is such a flagrant offense in
this post. Seriously Phil, come clean. Admit you're 42, admit you wrote the book, admit you enjoyed playing the stodgy old boomer role all these years. You got us, man, that was the real prank, not all this flip flopping in the past 48 hours.
We don't need to think you're old to respect your hockey insights. Heck, by now you're probably almost as old as you were claiming to be back in 2003! So come clean.
(Note: edited years and age after I realized that the thread was from 2009, not 11-12)