Bocephus86
Registered User
This is entirely incorrect. It was taken down to stop glorifying Saddam Hussein. He is still very much a part of history and will continue to be taught, just in the proper context of the whole man and not as some demi-god dictator. Actually great comparison, just not how you intended it to be.Keeping this in as light of a tone as possible, which it should be since we all are anonymous posters on a hockey discussion board.
The taking down of Saddam Hussein's statue certainly was intended to try to erase him from history. As is the taking down of statues of figures from previous centuries as a symbolic gesture of moving that person away from their position in history.
Perhaps moving forward we shouldn't be immortalizing anyone in stone. I certainly do not see the reason for it.
Also someone in here just learned about the situation with Gilmour. They only learned about it here because no one talks about the whole man. This is why talking about the whole man is important, to put into context who they are beyond just some great hockey player OR those terrible things are forgotten and we are just left with a hockey player to make a statue out of.