Reality Czech
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 5,437
- 8,829
Personally I am not a fan of using IR to get out of contract you don't want, whether its for cap circumvention, cap space or whatever. I have been critical of other teams doing it so it would hypocritical of me to like this move for the Blues if that's what they are doing. If what Pagnotta is saying is true that Krug nixed another trade I could see Army signing all these 1 way defense contracts and telling Krug he is going to have to compete for ice time this year and possibly be waived. Then boom suddenly Krug has a mysterious injury that could keep him out for a long time.
The timing is going to arouse suspicion no doubt, although I really wonder if a player would willingly go on LTIR unless he had some fairly serious health issues. These guys are too much of competitors to just stop playing hockey if they are fit enough to play. Maybe guys at the end of their career would agree to it if they're near retirement, but I bet that most of these guys have legit reasons to go on LTIR.
I was extremely suspicious of the Hossa thing until I heard him interviewed on Spittin Chiclets and unless he's a very convincing actor and liar then I have to believe what he said about his skin condition and how debilitating it was. He wouldn't stop playing just to bail the Hawks out of cap hell despite how much I believed it at the time. I don't know that any NHL player would unless he simply lost his desire to play or was actually injured.
That being said, if Krug's got a nagging ankle injury then it could explain why his play has been worse these past two years. It could be a situation where he could technically play on it, but if a guy is only at 50-75% of his potential then it makes sense to put him on the shelf. Regardless the timing is very interesting, and it makes a lot more sense why Army was shopping for d-men this summer.