None
Registered User
- Feb 22, 2012
- 11,746
- 17,344
Still obvious areas to work on but we're 3-0 so
11How many straight wins at IG Field is that now?
They got the run going a bit, and string together a couple of nice drives. Even our kicking looked decent!Nice 2nd half for the Bombers tonight, still need some fine tunning in some areas.
Two, we lost the preseason gameHow many straight wins at IG Field is that now?
The Bombers have been more worthy of your iambic pentameter labour than the Jets then last few years... Good to see you post in this thread!I for one am not unhappy.
Let not Bomber’s ragged starts deface,
Thy sweet three and oh summer, ere thou be distilled:
Make sweet some vial; treasure thou some place
With highest expectation ere it be self-killed.
Augustine’s use is not forbidden usury,
Which happies those that pay the willing loan;
That’s for Jefferson to breed another D-borne TD,
Or ten times happier, be it ten for one;
Ten times thyself were happier than Leigghio art,
If Collaros ten times refigured wins for thee:
Then what could death do if he shouldst depart,
Leaving thee living in posterity?
Bombers be not self-willed, for thou art much too fair
Seek the slow and steady conquest and make the Cup thine heir.
That's absolutely insane. Especially for the cflThe Bombers are now 20-1 with Collaros. That is uncanny.
Maybe I’ve been too hard on the Bombers; between Hamilton taking Evans over (the admittedly washed) Masoli, and Suckskatchewan choosing Fajardo over Collaros, it appears we aren’t the only team in this league that doesn’t have a clue how to scout/evaluate QB talent.
What makes it crazier is they were trending down before they got him, they had lost four of the last five before he came on board.That's absolutely insane. Especially for the cfl
Thanks! I will do this much more often, and I love the Bombers.The Bombers have been more worthy of your iambic pentameter labour than the Jets then last few years... Good to see you post in this thread!
Remember when that was the book on Dane Evans...Nathan Rourke is legit. He looks cool, composed, has accuracy and strength on his balls. He might draw NFL interest this off-season at this rate. He just turned 24 years old last month. He hasn't even used it, but at Ohio he was a star as a rushing QB as well. Loving this for the story. BC is not going to be the also ran they were predicted to be.
Yeah, Rourke was meh in the two games he played last year. Hard not to see the potential in his game right now but I’d pump the brakes on drawing NFL interest — I wanna see if he has similar success against better teams.Remember when that was the book on Dane Evans...
Remember when that was the book on Dane Evans...