Well dont you come up with your own excuses for not even be able to get to semi-final 5 years in a row in the world championship?
Plus this was my major issue even before the tournament. This is not a little issue, it is a big issue to not have neutral refs.
Based on the reports I'm not even sure the NHL cares. They can simply come up with their own generic blue and white jersey that says 'Finland' across the front.
But like others, this idea of 2 mixed teams is absolutely stupid.
This tourney will happen with the IIHF or not, with the European Federations or not. If they can't call a team "Team Russia", you can officially call them Europe 1, Europe 2 and so forth. Dumb, but it will get the job done. Could probably also simply call them, "Russians", "Swedes", "Finns", etc.
Secondly, don't think for one second the NHL is going to be strong-armed by the IIHF into continuing to go to the Olympics.
But like others, this idea of 2 mixed teams is absolutely stupid.
This tourney will happen with the IIHF or not, with the European Federations or not. If they can't call a team "Team Russia", you can officially call them Europe 1, Europe 2 and so forth. Dumb, but it will get the job done. Could probably also simply call them, "Russians", "Swedes", "Finns", etc.
Secondly, don't think for one second the NHL is going to be strong-armed by the IIHF into continuing to go to the Olympics.
The floated idea about the World Cup having Euro leftover all-star teams is as bad of an idea as the 2022 Winter Olympics host city bid process. Unless compromises are made by all sides the future of international hockey competitions looks bleak.
Lots of discussion and key International people will be in on this before they even contemplate such a radical move. And like the NHL players will let the NHL just say oh we're not going, it's going to get bloody and thank god for that.
Finland can ice a full NHL-lineup? What? Are we borrowing some D from Sweden? Altough that would be in line with what the league appears to be planning.
Interesting:http://www.olympic.org/news/olympic...uture-of-the-olympic-movement-unveiled/241063
Olympic Agenda 2020: Strategic roadmap for the future of the Olympic Movement unveiled just today.
It's changing for the better.
Yeah, based on what is in the article, it would be strictly a money-grab. With that in mind, the players would do it to increase revenues and if they are getting their piece of the pie. It may work once or twice as a novelty, but I think it would lose its luster fairly quickly.I can't see the players standing for this.
The Slovaks/Swiss will recoil at the idea of swaping their national jerseys for some "Euro" squad, especially while everyone else keeps theirs. A slap in the face.
Finns, Czechs and Russians will know their teams will be weakened without players from the Euro leagues. And even players from teams that will, or could, be entirely NHL (Canada, USA and Sweden) will know a farce when they see one.
There is one thing about all that. They could make NHL only tournament and even call it World Cup. But what they surely couldn't do is to call participating teams as team Russia, team Finland and team Sweden without national federations approval. Because even if they have the guts for such impertinence, most players from those countries wouldn't go against their federations and wouldn't participate in that scam.
There was the time when NHL guys weren't allowed to participate in IIHF tournaments and Canada have actually boycotted those tournaments because of it. Do you really think that now it can be a threat for IIHF? Seriously?![]()
Well that's my point... The only group with any significant power are the players.
So why is leaving the olympics even in the discussion? We already know the Russians won't consider not playing, and every single Swede who's ever talked about it media has been 100% for the olympics.
So, this is a non-issue?![]()
I should have said along with the NHL/NHL team owners (I assumed that was understood as a given) it appears the players are the only group with any real power... I think we all know what group is the issue between those two.
Well let's put it this way, there's plenty of superstars that would leave for the olympics regardless of what the NHL say.
Why should the NHL be concerned about the European fan? Just like the Czech League, the SEL, and KHL really shouldn't be concerned with the North American fan. Each league has to do what they think their fan base wants.Maybe this is good for NA viewers point, and that's excatly what NHL goes for. But how does this really grow hockey or even NHL's reputation in Europe? Many dissapointed fans in Europe for sure.. Slovakia and Switzerland should have included in this tournament.
Why should the NHL be concerned about the European fan? Just like the Czech League, the SEL, and KHL really shouldn't be concerned with the North American fan. Each league has to do what they think their fan base wants.
If the NHL and IIHF come to an agreement for a World Cup, and Sweden, Finland, etc all get on board. Should the KHL cave to make the Canadian and American fan happy?
You know that we also have option to order NHL games from viasat
more orders = more money..
Well let's put it this way, there's plenty of superstars that would leave for the olympics regardless of what the NHL say.
Well that's my point... The only group with any significant power are the players.
It wasn't the NHL who had a problem with NHL players being barred from IIHF tournaments, it was Canada's national fed. I think the NHL would have been perfectly fine (probable preferred it) if the IIHF never lifted the ban on NHL players participating in their tournaments.
No, they wouldn't. Maybe a very small number, but most will be trying to make the playoffs and win games with the same group of people they've been with for at least all season. If this was the prestigious Olympics of 1998-2014, maybe they go for the intensely-high level of competition and to be part of the best roster the country can assemble, but not if it's the best of the Euro leagues etc in South Korea.