Curufinwe
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 56,607
- 44,726
He's scoring at a 4th line rate this season - 17th best out of 18 Nashville forwards.
Player Season Totals - Natural Stat Trick
www.naturalstattrick.com
Value of: Better return: Meier vs Jeannot
- Thread starter Cloned
- Start date
Byrddog
Lifer
- Nov 23, 2007
- 7,521
- 841
The thing is value. Meier has the potential to have a long successful productive career. This does not justify the load paid for him.
Jeannot had a anomaly year last year and is back to being 10- 25 3rd liner. And there is no justification to the amount the Bolts gave up for him. Even if they are late round picks . Yhis is truly a case of quantity beating hell out of quality. If Foot is no more than a 3rd pair guy or even a 7th guy all you have to do is pick one bottom 6 guy with the 5 picks to be the winner of the trade.
Some Gm’ need to be drug tested.
Jeannot had a anomaly year last year and is back to being 10- 25 3rd liner. And there is no justification to the amount the Bolts gave up for him. Even if they are late round picks . Yhis is truly a case of quantity beating hell out of quality. If Foot is no more than a 3rd pair guy or even a 7th guy all you have to do is pick one bottom 6 guy with the 5 picks to be the winner of the trade.
Some Gm’ need to be drug tested.
How can this even be a debate? The Preds got a bottom pairing defenseman and five draft picks, for a third line player.
Gecklund
Registered User
How anyone is saying Jeannot is dumb.
23 1st>25 1st
Conditional 24 2nd/1st=24 2nd
Zetterlund>23 3rd
Okhotiuk>23 4th
Johnsson<23 5th
Shakir>>>Foote
23 1st>25 1st
Conditional 24 2nd/1st=24 2nd
Zetterlund>23 3rd
Okhotiuk>23 4th
Johnsson<23 5th
Shakir>>>Foote
Cloned
Begging for Bega
- Aug 25, 2003
- 80,604
- 69,501
That’s the point. Part of the poll context is seeing if people treat one as being more important than the other when evaluating a trade.
PromisedLand
I need more FOOD
This!
Look at Jeannot's production; I still cannot understand the haul preds got for a 3rd/4th liner. I've never seen this in the history of NHL
AtlantaWhaler
Thrash/Preds/Sabres
- Jul 3, 2009
- 20,087
- 3,309
Here's where the thread is tricky... Meier >>>>>>>Jeannot
So, return v return goes to Meier, yes. But, better return based on the actual trade value? Jeannot by a mile.
The Jeannot return is better. We're talking about about a top 6 forward in Meier compared to a bottom 6 in Jeannot. I guarantee this was Tampa GMs starting bid and Polie was like, is this guy serious?
PromisedLand
I need more FOOD
b/c Meier has superstar potential and is probably going to light it up offensively
A fourth liner? Third liner maybe. If you've paid attention. Tampa generally deploys these his pretty effectively once they get their hands on them.
The Meier return was clearly quite a bit more. Half of what Tampa gave up for Jeannot has little to no value(4th and 5th round picks have almost no value, and Foote is bad).
But relative to the skill of each player, Jeanot definitely got more. A 1st + 2nd for Jeanot is extremely well done for Nashville, the rest just doesn't add up to much. There's probably a ~25% chance Nashville gets an NHL player from those other picks.
But relative to the skill of each player, Jeanot definitely got more. A 1st + 2nd for Jeanot is extremely well done for Nashville, the rest just doesn't add up to much. There's probably a ~25% chance Nashville gets an NHL player from those other picks.
The comment was "who did it better". I realize Jeannot is a bottom 6 guy, albeit one with a unique set of skills that Tampa has shown a willingness to spend on repeatedly now with this move, the Hagel move, Coleman, and Goodrow over the last stretch of years. There are people stacking up the returns as being better for Nashville in total. That is not the case.
GirardSpinorama
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2004
- 21,596
- 10,617
Meiers is a way better player but he has a 10MM OS. That drastically lowered his trade value, so sucks for SJ.
danyhabsfan
Registered User
Hammettf2b
oldmanyellsatcloud.jpg
ON3M4N
Ignores/60 = Elite
If I'm looking at just the pieces then it's Timo. If I take into account the player the pieces were traded for vs what I think said players value is, then its Jeannot.
DownIsTheNewUp
Registered User
This. I don't think many people grasp how much more valuable a 1st is than later round picks.
Last edited:
What's the gag here?
2025 1st, 2024 2nd, and a 3rd, 4th and 5th in 2023 with. 25 year old D prospect in Foote.
A top two protected 1st in 2023, a 2nd with achievable conditions on become a 1st, Mukhamadullin, Okhotiuk, Zetterlund, a cap dump and a 7th. Meier also had Harrington, a fifth, and AHL fodder attached to him.
At worst, Foote+3rd, 4th and 5th is less than Okhotiuk, Muk, and Zetterlund, with this years first beating a 2025 first, and a second is a second, if San Jose/New Jersey don't have their conditions met.
Are we just over valuing Foote? One return is objectively better here. And it's definitely Meier.
I think Jeannot got the much better return versus expectations, however, but Tampa always pays a premium for physical guys lower down the line up.
2025 1st, 2024 2nd, and a 3rd, 4th and 5th in 2023 with. 25 year old D prospect in Foote.
A top two protected 1st in 2023, a 2nd with achievable conditions on become a 1st, Mukhamadullin, Okhotiuk, Zetterlund, a cap dump and a 7th. Meier also had Harrington, a fifth, and AHL fodder attached to him.
At worst, Foote+3rd, 4th and 5th is less than Okhotiuk, Muk, and Zetterlund, with this years first beating a 2025 first, and a second is a second, if San Jose/New Jersey don't have their conditions met.
Are we just over valuing Foote? One return is objectively better here. And it's definitely Meier.
I think Jeannot got the much better return versus expectations, however, but Tampa always pays a premium for physical guys lower down the line up.
I voted Meier based solely on the returning assets, but value out to return ratio was definitely in favor of Jeannot
EastVillageBlues
Registered User
- Feb 18, 2019
- 1,079
- 685
Any way you slice it, the TBL price is comparatively terrible.
But they are a team that has a history of trading not for the best value, but for the best fit in terms of team structure, and effect in playoff series. So we shouldn't be that surprised that they got the guy who they think will help them this year and in the next few years' of post-seasons.
DatDude44
Hmmmm?
- Feb 23, 2012
- 6,222
- 3,019
Nashville got alot more value relative to the piece they got rid of, SJ got a nicer overall package in return but moved an absolute stud at 26 yrs old.
NSH made out like bandits, SJ got worked hard. They better pray mukhamadullin is legit
NSH made out like bandits, SJ got worked hard. They better pray mukhamadullin is legit
Better value relative to the player? If so it's close.
Otherwise, very easily the Meier return. Not close.
Otherwise, very easily the Meier return. Not close.
Quid Pro Clowe
Registered User
Harrington was only with Karlsson because Megna got traded before him. He’s the definition of a 7th dman.
Tampa is going to be trending towards Detroit territory if this keeps up. That's not a good thing. You need cheap prospects to continue to replace expensive and aging players. Top 6 forward, Top 4 defense, #1 goalie is they type of return for a trade like this. Not a third line winger that can be found on any given team.
