Xspyrit
DJ Dorion
It’s not a best player vote for 2000-2015.
What else could it be? If it was the best at skating, then the options wouldn't make sense
It’s not a best player vote for 2000-2015.
What else could it be? If it was the best at skating, then the options wouldn't make sense
I remember when Chara turned his nose into a blood fountain.either way, the answer is David Koci
I think it’s weird that Crosby doesn’t have much more of the votes. By nearly all accounts he is a top 10 player all time here. He was easily the best player in the world for two seasons and on pace in more.
Lidstrom is more often like a top 15 and his whole career isn’t in this time frame. Don’t think he was ever the best player in the world during this time either.
Am I crazy for thinking Lidstrom was quite a bit better than him in his prime? I was pretty young in 2000, so I"m genuinely asking. Lidstrom is still the best defenseman I've ever seen (that I actually watched play growing up).Voted Niedermayer but Crosby is right there as well.
Niedermayer was the best pure skater in the game for a decent length of time.
Am I crazy for thinking Lidstrom was quite a bit better than him in his prime? I was pretty young in 2000, so I"m genuinely asking. Lidstrom is still the best defenseman I've ever seen (that I actually watched play growing up).
I think hockey fans have a very difficult time assessing the value of extra seasons vs the value of higher performance in fewer seasons.
Weighing 10 years of Ovechkin or Crosby vs 15 seasons of Lidstrom is interesting to me, although to certain posters that somehow becomes a deeply offensive topic for reasons that were never explained. Personally, I think Ovechkin and Crosby very clearly had much higher peaks than Lidstrom but it's not worth 50% more on a per season basis, and so you gotta go with the all-time great who has an additional 5 seasons (50% more seasons) in this window.
-Or-
You could take the literal interpretation of "best" without a care for longevity in which case the answer is obviously Ovechkin since his peak was inarguably much better than Sidney Crosby's.
Yor logic may make sense, but the math doesn't work.
Lidstrom retired in 2012.
If you include the 2015-2016 season in the OP's comparison, that leaves 11 seasons of Ovi/Crosby vs 11 of Lidstrom. If you end it in 2014-2015, that's still 11 to 10 seasons, and enough for a higher peak (ie Crosby/Ovechkin) to be selected above Lidstrom.