Yeah, agreed. I'm just hoping Benning ignores context/player value. It's happened before
when Benning is your GM you know the return is gonna suck tho
A competent GM would absolutely explore the market for Tanev in the wake of the Larsson-for-Hall deal. The Canucks aren't going to compete right now, so if they can get a steep overpayment for Tanev they might just acquire a star forward from a desperate team.
On the other hand, Jim Benning.
As an Oiler fan I would over pay for him . Yakupov , 2017 1st , Fayne for cap reason as we would still need a RH PMD
Klefbom Larsson
Sekera Tanev
Davidson Barrie .
Wishful thinking on my part . I guess it more of a dream about the Oilers having a good D
I've never seen a more mediocre player generate more discussion around here than Tanev.
I've never seen a more mediocre player generate more discussion around here than Tanev.
You must be watching a kid player that is has a Tanev jersey . Because you description of him sure does not match up with the games I seen him play . He is a very steady Shut down D . Probably a number 2 or 3 D as shut down D don't seem to get the respect unless they are putting up 40 + points to boot
As an Oiler fan I would over pay for him . Yakupov , 2017 1st , Fayne for cap reason as we would still need a RH PMD
Klefbom Larsson
Sekera Tanev
Davidson Barrie .
Wishful thinking on my part . I guess it more of a dream about the Oilers having a good D
I've never seen a more mediocre player generate more discussion around here than Tanev.
Only way moving Tanev could make some sense is if they have a deal in place to acquire Tyson Barrie. Would depend on what the asking price for Barrie is and what they could get in return for Tanev, but with Benning and Co. in charge, I don't like the potential of either scenario.
Only way moving Tanev could make some sense is if they have a deal in place to acquire Tyson Barrie. Would depend on what the asking price for Barrie is and what they could get in return for Tanev, but with Benning and Co. in charge, I don't like the potential of either scenario.
This . Benning is going to be Benning . He is the Eakins of GM's but there always the old saying or quote for Dallas Eakins . The Canuck are visually better , but only on paper
WHat is the situation with Tanev...when he says he doesnt want to trade him ...why is there even a discussion? is he pending UFA or something?
I can see Benning trading Tanev and a 2nd to chicago for Campbell and a 3rd. Sad but possible
I could see the Avs wanting a guy like Tanev in return for Barrie, so that isn't and awful reach of an idea. I think there isn't a 1 for 1 deal there, but a solid base for a deal
yak+1st is overpayment?
Not even Benning is that stupid
WHat is the situation with Tanev...when he says he doesnt want to trade him ...why is there even a discussion? is he pending UFA or something?