Bennett hit on Stolarz (no supplemental discipline) MOD WARNING IN POST #621

Status
Not open for further replies.
There were literally people referring to the fact that he kept playing after the intermission as evidence that the shot didn't hurt him.

Obviously BS?
Yup, obviously BS statistic. At least you read the "study" finally. Kinda surprising you still wanna die on this hill after doing so though.

A headshake after a hit/object to the head does indicate a concussion 72% of the time. How do I know that? Because I have common sense. Reminder, the direct bs statistic you keep defending: "25 seconds after the hit he did a SHAAKE (Spontaneous Headshake after a Kinematic Event) which predicts concussion 72% of the time". That isn't what that study proves. At all.

On any topic of research, blatantly biased/manipulated/agenda driven studies or misrepresentations/conclusions from said studies, actually damage future legitimate progress in a given field/topic.

Mind you, again, I actually agree the shot likely caused the initial concussion. But bringing in obviously trash "science"/"statistics" discredits that viewpoint. No reason to do so. Appeal to authority fallacy.
 
Does same mean different in your world?
Stolarz has a 34 game pedigree in a position that is voodoo. I'm not going to say it's a huge blow that one of the Leafs' prior-to-this-season fringe goalies might be out. Of course, if the Leafs lose, it will be the excuse, as if their Hasek was shot and killed by Bennett and the league conspired to not punish him for it.
 
Yup, obviously BS statistic. At least you read the "study" finally. Kinda surprising you still wanna die on this hill after doing so though.

A headshake after a hit/object to the head does indicate a concussion 72% of the time. How do I know that? Because I have common sense. Reminder, the direct bs statistic you keep defending: "25 seconds after the hit he did a SHAAKE (Spontaneous Headshake after a Kinematic Event) which predicts concussion 72% of the time". That isn't what that study proves. At all.

On any topic of research, blatantly biased/manipulated/agenda driven studies or misrepresentations/conclusions from said studies, actually damage future legitimate progress in a given field/topic.

Mind you, again, I actually agree the shot likely caused the initial concussion. But bringing in obviously trash "science"/"statistics" discredits that viewpoint. No reason to do so. Appeal to authority fallacy.
What is the agenda? What is the manipulation? Can you actually point to anything that indicates something was manipulated instead of just parroting this nonsense over and over?

Your repeated assertion that you have "common sense" is quite literally meaningless. The study, in their own study cohort, actually exactly proves the statement "SHAAKE (Spontaneous Headshake after a Kinematic Event) which predicts concussion 72% of the time", because, in their cohort, that is literally what it did. 72% was the PPV in that study, and that is the definition of PPV...

Now you can argue that we need to see much larger studies and validate this in (ideally) a prospective cohort before saying that it's generalizable as a sign, but the 72% number is not manipulated in the slightest lol.

It's hilarious that people "thinking for themselves" just consists of calling things BS and proclaiming "common sense" as their basis for an opinion. Translation - you are totally making shit up and asserting it as fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils
Yawn. Welcome the 2nd round. Didn’t see this outrage when Bennett cheap-shotted Marchand last year. But now the leaf media is all aghast. Anyway, can’t wait till the Canadian media’s golden boy Matthew Tkachuk does something even worse and they finally turn on him too. ‘Bout time.

Edit: Also, y’all love Craig Berube but his 2019 St. Louis Blues were even worse.
 
What is the agenda? What is the manipulation? Can you actually point to anything that indicates something was manipulated instead of just parroting this nonsense over and over?

Your repeated assertion that you have "common sense" is quite literally meaningless. The study, in their own study cohort, actually exactly proves the statement "SHAAKE (Spontaneous Headshake after a Kinematic Event) which predicts concussion 72% of the time", because, in their cohort, that is literally what it did.

Now you can argue that we need to see much larger studies and validate this in (ideally) a prospective cohort before saying that it's generalizable as a sign, but the 72% number is not manipulated in the slightest lol.

It's hilarious that people "thinking for themselves" just consists of calling things BS and proclaiming "common sense" as their basis for an opinion. Translation - you are totally making shit up and asserting it as fact.
:laugh: :laugh: Nope, that's not what the study proves at all. READ THE ACTUAL STUDY. Several of us have pointed this out already. Enough. You already hilariously tried to make this political somehow so this won't be a worthwhile convo, but feel free to direct message if ya want.
 
That would be a penalty in the regular season

It should be a penalty in the play-offs

The NHL has never done enough for player suspensions in the play offs
 
There were literally people referring to the fact that he kept playing after the intermission as evidence that the shot didn't hurt him.

Obviously BS?


"For the study, 347 current and former athletes between the ages of 18 and 29 were surveyed. They were shown video examples of SHAAKEs and asked about their experiences with them. 69% reported exhibiting a SHAAKE, and 93% of those reported a SHAAKE in association with concussion at least once. Athletes reported exhibiting SHAAKEs a median of five times in their lives."

"The three most common reasons athletes reported for exhibiting a SHAAKE were “disorientation or confusion” (25%), “a feeling like you needed to jumpstart your brain” (23%), and “changes to your perception of space or perception of your body in space” (14%). Other reasons athletes reported for exhibiting a SHAAKE associated with a concussion included headache, dizziness, inability to keep their train of thought, and changes to vision, hearing, or balance. Reasons athletes exhibited a SHAAKE that are not associated with concussion include neck pain, chills, pain that was not a headache, and an emotional reaction to the preceding event."

The data is far from perfect, but the data they have certainly suggests a very high correlation between SHAAKE and concussion.

Calling that motion a SHAAKE is 100% speculative. Goalies do that motion to adjust their masks all the time without taking any hits.
 
Stolarz has a 34 game pedigree in a position that is voodoo. I'm not going to say it's a huge blow that one of the Leafs' prior-to-this-season fringe goalies might be out. Of course, if the Leafs lose, it will be the excuse, as if their Hasek was shot and killed by Bennett and the league conspired to not punish him for it.

Stolarz has a career SV% that would be 5th for this season. Woll would be tied 9-11th.

Stolarz has a career GAA that would be 9th for this season. Woll would be 27th.

Stolarz averages a shutout every 10 games he starts. Woll is every 38 games.

Give our regards to bizarro world for thinking a significant downgrade in goaltending isn't a huge blow to a team's playoff success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nofehr
Never thought I'd wish for a Toronto series win, but here we are.

Panthers are despicable but let's be real, they do bring entertainment. Hopefully the Leafs make Bennett pay. A series win would be the greatest revenge, but hopefully some pain is provided as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBeastCoast
It can't both be a "nothing play from Bennett" and also "all minor blows to the back of the head are a big deal".
Blows to the back of the head can be dangerous without Bennett needing a suspension

Driving is dangerous but we don’t ban cars do we?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad