Martin Skoula
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 11,770
- 18,071
What is the agenda? What is the manipulation? Can you actually point to anything that indicates something was manipulated instead of just parroting this nonsense over and over?
Your repeated assertion that you have "common sense" is quite literally meaningless. The study, in their own study cohort, actually exactly proves the statement "SHAAKE (Spontaneous Headshake after a Kinematic Event) which predicts concussion 72% of the time", because, in their cohort, that is literally what it did.
Now you can argue that we need to see much larger studies and validate this in (ideally) a prospective cohort before saying that it's generalizable as a sign, but the 72% number is not manipulated in the slightest lol.
It's hilarious that people "thinking for themselves" just consists of calling things BS and proclaiming "common sense" as their basis for an opinion. Translation - you are totally making shit up and asserting it as fact.
We have 95% of all documented concussions in the league recorded in 4K with slow-mo replays and follow up documentation of how severe they were in terms of recovery time. Surely spending a weekend going through footage of known verified concussions to spot a SHAAKE would yield a bigger and higher quality sample size than asking people if they REMEMBER something minor and specific happening to them physically during a brain trauma event that is specifically known for distorting memories.