Bedard, Michkov, or Celebrini: Who would you build around?

Who would you build your team around?


  • Total voters
    65

dmcccdmn

Registered User
Dec 10, 2005
1,369
515
UC Davis
If you're building a team from a clean slate and get to have either Bedard, Michkov or Celebrini, which one would you choose?

This is not a discussion about who will have a better stats sheet. Some things such as defense, leadership, etc, just don't show up in the stats sheet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Realgud

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
23,286
16,530
If you're building a team from a clean slate and get to have either Bedard, Michkov or Celebrini, which one would you choose?

This is not a discussion about who will have a better stats sheet. Some things such as defense, leadership, etc, just don't show up in the stats sheet.
Everything shows up in the stats sheet. If it doesn't, then it doesn't matter.

Just need to look at the correct stats.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Realgud and Barsky

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
37,105
59,742
Weegartown
As a big fan of all 3 players, I would want to build around Celebrini. One of the better teenage 200ft C to enter this league since the turn of the century. When you look at the Stanley Cup winners the last 20 years what most of them have in common is at least one great 2 way center.
 

tabness

be a playa 🇵🇸
Apr 4, 2014
2,947
5,287
Michkov has been impressive looks like he ate enough Big Macs to play in the big leagues from the 140 pound tip as a junior, meanwhile Bedard is really sucking but still fully expect him to be the best player of the new NHL era when he puts it together and loses the white stick tape.

I think Michkov will get close but no cigar to Bedard, can't even spell the other dudes name off the top of my head so who cares about him.
 

Barsky

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
307
170
Between Bedard and Michkov, really close, Michkov by a hair, but Celebrini is clearly #3 for me.
You don't build a consistent winner around a winger, every GM knows this

Yeah, this is it for me. Don’t know how Celebrini is leading. Maybe he’s in the same tier. I don’t think so, but it’s not so impossible. What I don’t agree with is him leading this poll. He’s third.
You haven't watched him play enough then, he has all the tools and is already outplaying Bedard , who has been pretty disappointing this season & Matvei is a winger, so no contest there
 
  • Like
Reactions: CupfortheSharks

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,147
26,854
New York
You haven't watched him play enough then, he has all the tools and is already outplaying Bedard , who has been pretty disappointing this season & Matvei is a winger, so no contest there
We're not even two months into the season. Let's see Celebrini have a better season than Bedard had last season before we say he's ahead of him.

Bedard has already proven himself in the NHL. Celebrini is like 12 games into his NHL career. I don't really care who is pacing at what level 12 games into an NHL season when comparing a proven player to an unproven player. I'm not going to all of a sudden believe I should take the sample of less than two months as more indicative than a full season of Bedard having one of the best D+1 seasons in recent memory compared to just a completely unproven Celebrini at this level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky

Barsky

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
307
170
We're not even two months into the season. Let's see Celebrini have a better season than Bedard had last season before we say he's ahead of him.

Bedard has already proven himself in the NHL. Celebrini is like 12 games into his NHL career. I don't really care who is pacing at what level 12 games into an NHL season when comparing a proven player to an unproven player. I'm not going to all of a sudden believe I should take the sample of less than two months as more indicative than a full season of Bedard having one of the best D+1 seasons in recent memory compared to just a completely unproven Celebrini at this level.
I don't disagree there, way too early for a poll, but the fact is Bedard has not shown himself to be the "generational talent" he was supposed to be, yet and he will always be undersized. I argued for Bedard with someone at the start of the year, right after Mack got hurt, but 4 goals so far this year is underwhelming af, let's be honest. Based on today, its Mack, for his size & 2 way game so far more than anything else, but that could so easily change b4 long
 
Last edited:

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,147
26,854
New York
I don't disagree there, way too early for a poll, but the fact is Bedard has not shown himself to be the "generational talent" he was supposed to be and he will always be undersized. I argued for Bedard with someone at the start of the year, right after Mack got hurt, but 4 goals so far this year is underwhelming af, let's be honest. Based on today, its Mack, for his size & 2 way game so far more than anything else, but that could so easily change b4 long
I don't think Celebrini is a generational talent either.

I think we might be looking at something analogous to Toews (Celebrini) vs. Kane (Bedard). It'll likely be somewhat close, but yeah give me the overall more skilled player between the two that can make more plays with the puck. I think that's Bedard.
 

Barsky

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
307
170
I don't think Celebrini is a generational talent either.

I think we might be looking at something analogous to Toews (Celebrini) vs. Kane (Bedard). It'll likely be somewhat close, but yeah give me the overall more skilled player between the two that can make more plays with the puck. I think that's Bedard.
That's probably a good analogy, Kane & Toews and I don't think Mac is generational either, but I'll take the bigger guy every time if the skill is close. They have the better track record when it matters most, in the playoffs, when the whistles go away and the big boys start playing dirty & throwing their weight around more recklessly. Size matters, the average NHL'er could rag doll Berard and that'll never change 🤷‍♂️
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,501
21,888
We're not even two months into the season. Let's see Celebrini have a better season than Bedard had last season before we say he's ahead of him.

Bedard has already proven himself in the NHL. Celebrini is like 12 games into his NHL career. I don't really care who is pacing at what level 12 games into an NHL season when comparing a proven player to an unproven player. I'm not going to all of a sudden believe I should take the sample of less than two months as more indicative than a full season of Bedard having one of the best D+1 seasons in recent memory compared to just a completely unproven Celebrini at this level.

Bedard didn’t have that great of a rookie season

There’s so much work for him to become a true franchise C and not a franchise W
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky

Barsky

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
307
170
Michkov has been impressive looks like he ate enough Big Macs to play in the big leagues from the 140 pound tip as a junior, meanwhile Bedard is really sucking but still fully expect him to be the best player of the new NHL era when he puts it together and loses the white stick tape.

I think Michkov will get close but no cigar to Bedard, can't even spell the other dudes name off the top of my head so who cares about him.
That dude is winning this poll for a reason, so maybe you could try to learn his pretty easy to spell name 🤷‍♂️
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,147
26,854
New York
Bedard didn’t have that great of a rookie season

There’s so much work for him to become a true franchise C and not a franchise W
Taking out the players who played only one game, he has the 3rd best U19 PPG in the NHL since the 2000-01 season after only Crosby and McDavid. Now I'm not saying he's generational like them. He's probably a little below, but he's still a very good player and had a very good rookie season.

Screen Shot 2024-11-28 at 3.56.02 PM.png
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad