Panzerspitze
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2010
- 5,044
- 1,040
They fired Trestman with two remaining. The idea that the McCaskey's won't spend money when told its time, is not true. Dumb as f***? Yep. They care about the Bears, they're just dumb as f*** and trust the wrong people.
Poles chose to keep Flus, thats it.
Yes, I know the McCaskey's being cheap storyline has been amply contradicted by past events. However, eating contracts on a routine basis has gotta hurt, even if one's a billionaire (or as more than a few online have pointed out, only if the McCaskey's sell the franchise), given the run of awful Bears management/coaches the ownership have had to absorb financial hits on over the years since Lovie.
Put yourself in Poles shoes, it wouldn't take too much to sell the first-time GM the "wisdom" of staying put with his first HC hire (nominally or not), e.g. Virginia the Matriarch positively fawning over the madeover HC and his good-boy character, that the players seemed to keep playing hard for the losiest HC in franchise history, the pseudo-success streak at the end of the 2023 season, and most importantly there's no crystal ball or guarantee that a new HC (be it an offense-minded one or not) would necessarily do better than the late 2023 season version of Flose, or that the second OC hire (Waldron) could be even worse than Getsy, or that the "consensus" No. 1 overall pick would not be an instant drop-in NFL starting QB, or that the 10-men deep OL would regress to the point of neither pass-protect nor run-block well, or that veteran players would vocally revolt in public and to the media. Finally, there's that financial side of things, of making ownership eat yet another contract with years left (would it have been 2 or 3 years, after 2023?) after Trestman, Emery, (Fox?,) Nagy, Pace, et al. Sure they ate a double-decker on Trestman, but would they have the appetite for another (or a triple-decker) on Flose? That is how Poles ended up with the "safe" choice of keeping Flose into 2024.
Last edited: