Babcock Interview (Since being hired by Saskatoon) "Something doesn't add up"

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Coaches are not hired by Larry but of course Babs was ... da Leaf mgmt setup was a complete FU ... and board/Larry caused it all
It's odd given Larry held the O'Brien trophy when the Raps won it all. They fired the coach of the year to have that happen. But he couldn't agree Babs needed to go
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeke
Babcock did things just to be a spiteful prick - sitting Leivo for ridiculous amounts of time, same with Holl. Benching Spezza in the home opener. Not playing guys Dubas just signed
He clearly feels the need to run the whole show
Good luck to him beacuse he'll never have that power again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lumberg
Babcock did things just to be a spiteful prick - sitting Leivo for ridiculous amounts of time, same with Holl. Benching Spezza in the home opener. Not playing guys Dubas just signed
He clearly feels the need to run the whole show


It's so sad because Babcock could have worked beautifully with Dubas.

In fact, look back at his first interviews when he was first hired pre-dubas and Babcock is preaching the exact same mobile puck possession puck moving style of hockey that dubas and Keefe want - but then year after year, likely out of spite, Babcock went further and further away from that and ended up being just another randy Carlyle.
 
It's odd given Larry held the O'Brien trophy when the Raps won it all. They fired the coach of the year to have that happen. But he couldn't agree Babs needed to go
Babs condition for joining Toronto is he wanted to interview Larry and find out what board authority he would have in running/coaching da team ... Shanny requested Larry to have mtg ... there was da mistake ... mistake by Shanny for allowing it ... mistake by Larry for accepting it ... and it created Babs world ... when I sit as chm of board of my companies I never would accept an interview from a VP of sales for 1 company to make a decision if he wants to join up with us ... why I am paying a president to run it?????????? ... if he can't convince guy to join then it my books it is over ... it created too many divisions ... and Babs looked at Lou as he equal and Shanny as his student and Dubie as kid running analytics for everyone
 
Phrases like culture appropriation, I've never understood why it's a bad thing now to say hey, this part of your culture is pretty freaking cool, I'm going to copy that / do that out of respect. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Thing is, though, not all cultural appropriation works that way. It depends quite a bit on the power dynamics between the culture doing the appropriating and the culture being appropriated.
 
I am really glad Dubas made the change from Babs but in order to be a good coach I think it was very common to do things that made players uncomfortable.
It does not justify the tactics but I will flat out say Babs was and is a great coach.
He will have to change in 2021 and his act wears thin but he has Stanley Cup, World Championship, World Junior, World Cup, University Cup and a Olympic ring to prove his value.

Arguably a top 5 all time resume of coaching achievements.
Top 5 teams
How could you not be great with Detroit vthen leaves when all the greats leave .
Toronto great young talent.
Coach the expansion team then we will see how great you are.
 
He’s not wrong, everyone knew Dubas would replace him first chance he could.

The thing is. While I think folks may have thought (accurately) that the two guys may have started things off with a tense relationship, but im suspect that Dubas had this grand scheme to unseat Babcock. If the two had been able to develop a proper working relationship, then Babcock would still be coach right now. I dont think Dubas being hired meant it was a guarantee Keefe was getting the job from that very moment.

I think Babs comments about this in particular actually put him in a worse light (and was a dumb thing for him tonday) because it makes his personnel decisions on guys luke Leivo or Holl look worse, almost as if he was daring Dubas to do something about it ect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy Firecracker
There’s many fans who believe a lot of things.

Many fans think Nylander is overpaid.
Many fans think Sam Bennett is a better play than Alex Kerfoot.
Many fans thought (including myself) that Joe Thornton on the top line would be a failure.
Many fans wanted Zach Hyman tossed overboard for a long time and spewed hate to anyone that could see different

What fans think doesn’t really matter.

The fact that Mike Babcock may have believed that, is apart of the problem.

Tells me Babcock gave up as soon as Kyle Dubas became GM, and didn’t care.

Heck, I’m not sure Babcock and Lou cared entering Lou’s final year either. Babcock fully admitted they knew the Marleau contract was going to be bad, but signed it anyway.

Who admits stuff like that?
He said a lot of dumb things no doubt.
 
Dubas hiring Keefe to coach in both the OHL and AHL says I'd have to agree with you. Having that in mind though was unfortunately going to be an uphill battle for both himself as coach and the team that he was coaching.
That’s all I’m saying, it seemed pretty apparent. Not sure why that upsets some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buds17
Like everyone here, I was a big fan of Babcocks resume and talents as a coach. Even in most of his time here I think he did a lot of good things. For some reason though, he slowly became his worst enemy. Being unable to adapt, learn and move forward as a professional is always going to catch up to you.

I don't understand why now he's becoming so vindictive to throwing people under the bus or trying to claim he's a victim of something. I understand he's probably still upset that Mike Babcock couldn't possibly have been fired but it happens. I am sure most HHOF builders/coaches were fired at some point in their career.

He needs to accept that it just didn't work out and move on already. He'll get many opportunities. I just hope he doesn't become so inflated with being right that he shoots himself in the foot even more.
 
Those of you that are turning on Babcock are disgusting. The guy may have some unusual ways to get the best out of his teams, but in the end he was successful.

People cannot sit there and say Babcock only had superstar teams that made him a success. The list is long of coaches that had superstars and the odds on favorite to win championships only to fail time and time again.

If there are players that are sensitive to coaching styles that is on them and their self esteem, not the coach. Shannahan played under Babcock for years and in turn hired him as the coach of the Leafs. Shanny doesnt look like someone that would crumble under scrutiny. If we take the word of Franzen or Chelios or Marner over the backing of players like Shanny, Yzerman, Draper, Lidstrom, Hull, Hasek, etc... All players that were key contributors to the Detroit glory years. Kariya, Neidermyer, Federov, Oates, etc that played for him in Anahiem? That is plain stupid.

Remember Babcock, Holland and Bowman all worked together in some capacity with the Red Wings organization during Babcock's tenure. Holland and Bowman are well respected individuals. Do you actually all think that they would put up with Babcock for as long as they did if he was as horrible of a coach as you all state?

Some players are soft and in the NHL, you need to be tough on players to get them where they should be in their effort and production. Most players react positively and that is on coaching. Some react poorly and that is on them. They are not better then the game and coaches are brought in to do what Babcock exactly did. Get the most out of team.

Some of you that sit there and state that Babcock was crap and egotistical. You need to be egotistical in a sport that is full of players that are far worse egotistical then he. Players believe its the league and coaches that owe them, but in reality its an honor to make it to the NHL and they owe it to the league and fans to produce and providing them the lifestyle that they have playing in it.

Sad to see that Babcock is being blackballed. Doesnt surprise me that Marner is in the middle of it. Always was a player full of drama coming up the ranks with his dad Paul. And when you look at Chelios, always was someone to shoot his mouth. Great players they both are in their own sense. But also 2 players that are all drama.

But for those of you that are saying what you all are about Babcock should all be ashamed. He brought the Leafs back to respectability when no one ever thought it was possible. Sooner then expected. Yes they werent able to get over the hump. But Leafs upper management really never gave him the players to succeed at his style of game that he succeeded in previous stops. He did as well as he could, with what he was given. Only now is Dubas, providing leadership and grit to some extent to his buddy Keefe. Dubas has as much to do with Babcock's demise as anyone. If anyone is to blame for his failures it is he. Not Babcock.
 
That’s all I’m saying, it seemed pretty apparent. Not sure why that upsets some.

Dubas and Keefe were quite successful together in the OHL, and especially in the AHL. Here's hoping for a third time! Hiring for familiarity and previous success isn't unheard of in the sports world. No doubt it can be tough to see that looking over one's shoulder. It is what it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224
Those of you that are turning on Babcock are disgusting. The guy may have some unusual ways to get the best out of his teams, but in the end he was successful.

People cannot sit there and say Babcock only had superstar teams that made him a success. The list is long of coaches that had superstars and the odds on favorite to win championships only to fail time and time again.

If there are players that are sensitive to coaching styles that is on them and their self esteem, not the coach. Shannahan played under Babcock for years and in turn hired him as the coach of the Leafs. Shanny doesnt look like someone that would crumble under scrutiny. If we take the word of Franzen or Chelios or Marner over the backing of players like Shanny, Yzerman, Draper, Lidstrom, Hull, Hasek, etc... All players that were key contributors to the Detroit glory years. Kariya, Neidermyer, Federov, Oates, etc that played for him in Anahiem? That is plain stupid.

Remember Babcock, Holland and Bowman all worked together in some capacity with the Red Wings organization during Babcock's tenure. Holland and Bowman are well respected individuals. Do you actually all think that they would put up with Babcock for as long as they did if he was as horrible of a coach as you all state?

Some players are soft and in the NHL, you need to be tough on players to get them where they should be in their effort and production. Most players react positively and that is on coaching. Some react poorly and that is on them. They are not better then the game and coaches are brought in to do what Babcock exactly did. Get the most out of team.

Some of you that sit there and state that Babcock was crap and egotistical. You need to be egotistical in a sport that is full of players that are far worse egotistical then he. Players believe its the league and coaches that owe them, but in reality its an honor to make it to the NHL and they owe it to the league and fans to produce and providing them the lifestyle that they have playing in it.

Sad to see that Babcock is being blackballed. Doesnt surprise me that Marner is in the middle of it. Always was a player full of drama coming up the ranks with his dad Paul. And when you look at Chelios, always was someone to shoot his mouth. Great players they both are in their own sense. But also 2 players that are all drama.

But for those of you that are saying what you all are about Babcock should all be ashamed. He brought the Leafs back to respectability when no one ever thought it was possible. Sooner then expected. Yes they werent able to get over the hump. But Leafs upper management really never gave him the players to succeed at his style of game that he succeeded in previous stops. He did as well as he could, with what he was given. Only now is Dubas, providing leadership and grit to some extent to his buddy Keefe. Dubas has as much to do with Babcock's demise as anyone. If anyone is to blame for his failures it is he. Not Babcock.

Get a grip and off your high horse
People are allowed to dislike your hero
 
TBH what Babcock did to Spezza last year in the first game of the season pretty much sums up his personality.
Honestly I've always kind of thought that was the beginning of the end of his tenure.
While I think he wasn't using our roster optimally (in large part to assert himself in some sort of power struggle with Dubas) last year's season was the first time we had seen the players just fully quit. Spezza is a guy who's loved by the whole team and benching him in that game was a dick move, no other way around it. Hard to think that went unfelt by the players.
 
TBH what Babcock did to Spezza last year in the first game of the season pretty much sums up his personality.

Yes, that you are not owed a spot on a team based on history or being the home town kid. You have to earn your spot.

And sorry I agree with him at that time, we had one too many Spezza's and not enough grit. Babcock in reality was giving more to fanbase and media which were complaining continuously of the lack of grit that contributed to their 2 straight years of early exits to the hands of the Capitals and Bruins. So he played grittier players instead of Spezza. Answered all of your complaints!!!

But then media and fans alike blamed Babcock for answering their call outs of use of players. So which one was it? You all wanted more grit? Or you wanted another over the hill Spezza that had no grit?
 
Those of you that are turning on Babcock are disgusting.

what if we turned on him 3 years ago, though?


The guy may have some unusual ways to get the best out of his teams, but in the end he was successful.

As Keefe's leafs have shown since the moment he took over, Babcock was clearly an epic failure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kanu
Get a grip and off your high horse
People are allowed to dislike your hero

High horse? Stating facts and if you had a clue you too would understand that Babcock got and is getting the raw deal.

He's a great coach and earned everything he got, from Stanley Cups to Olympic medals to coach of the year award.

He's not a bum like you are making him out to be.
 
Yes, that you are not owed a spot on a team based on history or being the home town kid. You have to earn your spot.

And sorry I agree with him at that time, we had one too many Spezza's and not enough grit. Babcock in reality was giving more to fanbase and media which were complaining continuously of the lack of grit that contributed to their 2 straight years of early exits to the hands of the Capitals and Bruins. So he played grittier players instead of Spezza. Answered all of your complaints!!!

But then media and fans alike blamed Babcock for answering their call outs of use of players. So which one was it? You all wanted more grit? Or you wanted another over the hill Spezza that had no grit?

First game of the year. Spezza chose to take a hometown discount to win a cup with his childhood team. It was against his former team. He got like two dozen tickets for his friends/family to come to the game. Spezza's highly regarded around the league. And it was against his old team.

It's one game that would have made a lot of sense to put Spezza in as the #4C, not asking for much. But Babcock couldn't do that.

Just like when he scratched Modano, who was sitting at 1,499 games played, and wouldn't let him get to 1,500 career game.

It's an egotistical dick move. It's nothing against his successes as a coach and how smart he was with the game. It's about his shitty personality that has seen him get run out of the NHL.
 
what if we turned on him 3 years ago, though?




As Keefe's leafs have shown since the moment he took over, Babcock was clearly an epic failure.

You turned on him 3 years ago because of his use of players that were given to him from management. Babcock stated time and time again that he wasnt happy with the choices made in certain acquisitions. But he played players that were given to him.

Since Keefe took over they are playing a different style then what Babcock expected. This isnt Babcocks style of play. When you hire a coach you provide players for their system. Babcock was never given that opportunity as a coach. Keefe on the hand is playing his system with players that were already here.

Sorry thats on management not coaching. You think someone like Trotz, who right now is probably the best coach in the NHL can come to Toronto and play his style of defensive trap hockey? Wont work in Toronto with the players we have today. Does that make the coach horrible?

If ownership and upper management were to bring in Trotz they would need to buy into his philosophy and style of play. Which would mean acquire players and draft players that fit his style. Well Shanny brought in upper management that had different views to Babcock. Thats on upper management.
 
You turned on him 3 years ago because of his use of players that were given to him from management. Babcock stated time and time again that he wasnt happy with the choices made in certain acquisitions. But he played players that were given to him.

Since Keefe took over they are playing a different style then what Babcock expected. This isnt Babcocks style of play. When you hire a coach you provide players for their system. Babcock was never given that opportunity as a coach. Keefe on the hand is playing his system with players that were already here.

Sorry thats on management not coaching. You think someone like Trotz, who right now is probably the best coach in the NHL can come to Toronto and play his style of defensive trap hockey? Wont work in Toronto with the players we have today. Does that make the coach horrible?

If ownership and upper management were to bring in Trotz they would need to buy into his philosophy and style of play. Which would mean acquire players and draft players that fit his style. Well Shanny brought in upper management that had different views to Babcock. Thats on upper management.

go back and read Mike Babcock's first interviews as leafs coach.

he was preaching exactly the style that Dubas and Keefe preach.
 
Like everyone here, I was a big fan of Babcocks resume and talents as a coach. Even in most of his time here I think he did a lot of good things. For some reason though, he slowly became his worst enemy. Being unable to adapt, learn and move forward as a professional is always going to catch up to you.

I don't understand why now he's becoming so vindictive to throwing people under the bus or trying to claim he's a victim of something. I understand he's probably still upset that Mike Babcock couldn't possibly have been fired but it happens. I am sure most HHOF builders/coaches were fired at some point in their career.

He needs to accept that it just didn't work out and move on already. He'll get many opportunities. I just hope he doesn't become so inflated with being right that he shoots himself in the foot even more.
I think Babcock accepted the firing without being defensive. What it seems he took issue with was all the hit pieces from the media that dug deep to find any dirt they possibly could. The worst they could find was "the list" (which I don't even understand what was so bad about it), and he yelled at a player that later revealed he had some mental health concerns at the time.

I mean... that's it? Then he becomes like the top news story in Toronto for like a week. Honestly, look at the way people were talking about him. He wasn't accused of racism, or sexism, or violence (or worse). Nope. It was a coach that was a "little" mean a few times to his adult millionaire players. And then he was turned into a literal monster. People really lost perspective regarding the whole thing.

I don't blame him for being defensive/vindictive about it.

And I was never a "Babcock" guy. He was clearly too old-school for our young core, and things work much better with "new-school" guy Keefe. I just think the reactions against Babcock went way way too far.
 
“You can't have the wife I have and the kids I have and the family I have without being a good human being. I don't have any problem with that whatsoever."

What an unbelievable lack of self awareness from a real piece of garbage

I dont get the hate. There's nothing wrong with what he said. You people are sensitive as hell
 
Mike had no idea how to build a team, I say that by the way he did things outside of hockey.

He wanted to "win" today at the expense of tomorrow. And that doesnt work in today's game....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad