WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 34,618
- 12,791
Babcock makes Babcock come across (as) a complete asshole.
Yeah, that is more appropriate.
Babcock makes Babcock come across (as) a complete asshole.
lol there's people in here defending him because they hate the leafs core forwards so much. Might want to see what he did to Johan Franzen who contemplated suicide at points.
Chris Chelios was also blackballed by him and Mike Modano got f***ed out of game 1500 because Babcock couldn't have anyone else have the limelight
Yep, that was the same coach in CBJ I was referring to.He also went off on Jets new head coach Scott Arniel this week.
So now he's firing shots at everyone in Toronto for exposing him as the fraud we all know him to be.
Meh, I'd be willing to bet that's exactly what happened in Chicago. There is a reason the NHL has banned him from coaching again.
Power imbalances come in all shapes and sizes.I’m still not sure how a 6’3” professional athlete gets abused by a 5’7” non-athlete. I find it hard to blame Q for not really taking it seriously. I probably would think it was a joke.
Shanahan would have known exactly what Babcock was, because he's probably no different than a ton of coaches who have come in and out of the league over the years. These guys don't get to this level without having their own unique personality flaws, no different than the players. The only difference is that most of the time this stuff never gets into the public domain.What I want to know is how were Shanahan & Lou so completely unaware of who he was before they hired him? Or were they?
Power imbalances come in all shapes and sizes.
If you're a rookie and you feel like your career is at stake, and you become convinced that the video coach has the head coach's ear....it's not hard to imagine.If the guy was actually in a position of power, it would make sense. He was a video coach….
What a disgusting comment. Bigger people can be abused by smaller people. Maybe educate yourself a bit on abuse before trying to absolve people who helped contribute to it.I’m still not sure how a 6’3” professional athlete gets abused by a 5’7” non-athlete. I find it hard to blame Q for not really taking it seriously. I probably would think it was a joke.
Predators don’t just rely on size. A 6 foot shark can kill you just as easily as a 30 foot Orca.I’m still not sure how a 6’3” professional athlete gets abused by a 5’7” non-athlete. I find it hard to blame Q for not really taking it seriously. I probably would think it was a joke.
Yeah, I mean...kind of. To pretend that Beach isn't responsible or in control of any of his actions is kind of crazy though.What a disgusting comment. Bigger people can be abused by smaller people. Maybe educate yourself a bit on abuse before trying to absolve people who helped contribute to it.
What a disgusting comment. Bigger people can be abused by smaller people. Maybe educate yourself a bit on abuse before trying to absolve people who helped contribute to it.
I would react by getting all the facts to the story.If someone told you Mitch Marner was abusing Ryan Reaves, how would you react?
I would react by getting all the facts to the story.
Like any human would, you feel empathy for Reaves.If someone told you Mitch Marner was abusing Ryan Reaves, how would you react?
Babs is a strange dude but what's up with doing this article now ?
The article is a reaction to Jim Montgomery happily sharing how he had an encouraging chat with Babcock before Game 7. The CBJ episode may have finally blackballed Babcock from ever getting another NHL coaching gig, but his influence among 'the hockey men' still clearly prevails (and was part of why CBJ decided to give him another chance). Kneecapping the sport's worst people is kind of Katie Strang's 'thing', so the angle won't necessarily be 'fair', but she's pretty good at it.The article claims that Babcock still has massive influence in the game and is consulted by a lot of teams.
The same way I would react if someone told me Ryan Reaves was abusing Mitch Marner. I don't support abuse of any kind (regardless of who the victim/aggressor is), or the people in power who minimize and foster it for their own personal benefit. It's kind of disgusting that anybody would have any other answer.If someone told you Mitch Marner was abusing Ryan Reaves, how would you react?
We can separate his ability to judge & evaluate talent, with his ability to be a decent human being.Was he wrong about any of these guys though? Players he liked, typically have succes, players he doesn't like... typically dont.
Holl, Engvall, Holland, Malgin, Petan... these are all guys that he wouldn't have any interest of having on his team.
He loves guys like Hyman, Moore.
Seems like he's a guy who just doesn't have time for guys he knows are not gonna win and are a waste of his time. If they worked their ass off for him, he'd have rewarded him.
Instead a guy like Holland, whose work ethic was questioned before Toronto wants to meet with him? Instead of working for it on the ice?
Sure... maybe wrong approach at times, but not wrong on the players and certainly worse has likely happened in everyday work for all of us.
He played Bozak a ton, Kadri a lot... etc.
The same way I would react if someone told me Ryan Reaves was abusing Mitch Marner. I don't support abuse of any kind (regardless of who the victim/aggressor is), or the people in power who minimize and foster it for their own personal benefit. It's kind of disgusting that anybody would have any other answer.
I’m not the one pretending to be something else. Deny it all you want, but you’re just as confused how this all went down as I am.
All abuse situations are not the same. That's the whole point. You didn't "ask questions". You minimized the abuses that bigger people can experience from people smaller than them, dismissed the power imbalances at play, and attempted to absolve somebody in power who failed that individual and helped foster an abusive environment for his own personal benefit. Now you're mocking people that show empathy to the victims of abuse.There’s a difference between supporting abuse and asking questions about how and why it happened.
Pretending every situation is the same just minimizes the real victims of abuse.
Do you really find it so incomprehensible that a member of the coaching staff was able to target a player on the fringes of the team?
All abuse situations are not the same. That's the whole point. You didn't "ask questions". You minimized the abuses that bigger people can experience from people smaller than them, dismissed the power imbalances at play, and attempted to absolve somebody in power who failed that individual and helped foster an abusive environment for his own personal benefit.
Now you're mocking people that show empathy to the victims of abuse.