Cousin Eddie
You Serious Clark?
- Nov 3, 2006
- 40,235
- 37,580
Why do the highlights look so pathetic?Allsvenskan and J20 are perfectly good leagues for draftees and +1's. Allsvenskan is among the best 2nd tier pro leagues in Europe.
Why do the highlights look so pathetic?Allsvenskan and J20 are perfectly good leagues for draftees and +1's. Allsvenskan is among the best 2nd tier pro leagues in Europe.
Probably cause the rink is the size of Lake Erie.Why do the highlights look so pathetic?
Interesting. The Avs must want him developing closer.
Interesting. I thought this signing might be a sign they wanted him to come over next year. They did this with both Mikko and Kaut.
The tentative plan is probably to have him play a full year with the Eagles for stability, but if he impresses he could earn a callup. Kaut didn't get one, but Mikko got a few games to start and end his first season in NA.
I like this route for European players to help them get acclimatized to the NA style of play. Especially when they've already been playing pro against men in Europe.
To be a really good team we need to get one more player similar to what Rantanen is now. If Olausson could be Rantanen 2.0 then we should be contending for a long time.
Starting the clock at 18 is not ideal. Nobody who has any other options should be in the AHL unless there’s a realistic plan to call them up that year.
Right, unfortunately.Isn’t he in the same situation as Kaut though, with the 5 year ELC?
Starting the clock at 18 is not ideal. Nobody who has any other options should be in the AHL unless there’s a realistic plan to call them up that year.
Right, unfortunately.
I think TV is talking about how quickly the Avs run out of patience with prospects in the AHL. Guys can get lost down there. It might already be happening to Kaut (although who knows with the weird taxi squad thing last season). It seems like if you don't impress right away in the AHL you can get buried and forgotten.
Whether that's a symptom of bad development or whether guys just aren't good enough is up for debate, but either way, the pattern is there.
I not necessarily arguing for TV's hypothesis, just trying to clarify what she likely means by "starting the clock". If I'm wrong then by all means correct me @tigervixxxenWho are the guys who have been buried and forgotten though? It seems more like just a lot of shitty drafting to me.
Why else would they bring him over.If they want to start Oskar this early hopefully there’s a graduation plan in place.
To ruin his career obviously.Why else would they bring him over.
The facts are it does not benefit anyone to spend years in the AHL. Anyone that’s succeeded here has been out between 40-60 games and even the “patient” orgs have them out by 100. If a guy makes it past 100 AHL games it’s in a second chance + opportunity elsewhere. If they want to start Oskar this early hopefully there’s a graduation plan in place.
I think being bad at drafting is one thing, but our inability to develop bottom-6 forwards is almost non-existant.
Take Bowers for example, rather than having him work on the attributes that he has that makes him a good bottom-6er, they'll have him be an offensive catalyst in the AHL and when that isn't working, just move on.
Would be much more beneficial to have him carve out a role rather than top-6 or bust him. Looks like it's happening with Kaut too, although his issue is his conditioning for the most part.
The only bottom-6 guy this team has developed in the last 10 years is Jost, and that was unintentional. The org probably still believes he can be a 2C. After that you have to go all the way back to Mark Olver to find that type of guy.
Funny enough, the one player that they actually pegged as a 3C and were trying to develop there was ROR, even more proof of how bad they are at doing that.
I don't buy the Avs can't develop bottom 6 guys. LOC looks like he'll be a great one. Jost and Compher have spent their entire pro careers in the Avs' org. I just think the Avs are very bad at finding guys who can fit what they do and be okay when they disappoint. In that case, Jost is a shining example of that possibly changing in the org. They've kept him around despite him disappointing on the level they thought he'd be.
I do think the Avs have high expectations and low patience levels on players. If a player can't cut it early in their by their 3rd ELC year, they are usually looking to move on shortly after. I hope the Jost change is something the the org as a whole is going through.
LOC took his large step forward with the Eagles. He wasn't on the radar of a lot of people as a legit NHL prospect, then he took off when he went pro. I'd personally throw that as a win on the scouting and development side.I'd argue that LOC developed mostly in College, and was brought in with the knowledge that he'd be a bottom-6 guy, so they never tried to force him to be more than that and expectations were lower. Compher is the same as Jost, the org doesn't view them as bottom-6 guys, never tried to develop them that way, and still try to force them into the top-6 whenever they can.
Right, unfortunately.
I know the contract would slide and that is not a benefit to the player at all to have a 5 year ELC and 4 years of waiver exemption. They basically give up a lot of rights in this scenario.
When a guy starts playing pro regardless of age the runway to make it gets shorter by the day. There’s a little consideration that the guy is still a teenager, it’s early, but not much. The AHL should be a last step springboard to a NHL career.