- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,548
- 39,390
I think BB is more valuable than CC, and I think BB ends up the better player
would pass from Colorado perspective
would pass from Colorado perspective
Caufield and Byram are on the same tier prospect
There's a stratosphere betweenn a future Ekholm and a 4th line plug
Caufield was the top goal scorer in the NCAA last year. Do you know who was number 2 behind him? Yep.Caufield and Byram are on the same tier prospect
There's a stratosphere betweenn a future Ekholm and a 4th line plug
One of them was 18, the other one 20Caufield was the top goal scorer in the NCAA last year. Do you know who was number 2 behind him? Yep.
And sampo was not playing with future NHL player D Holloway either. That’s not some massive gap as your project.
One of them was 18, the other one 20
I'll let you guess which ones which
Habs Aren't trading a top5 prospect in the world and another prob around top30 for Byram and a guy who can't even crack the top100 prospectIs Caufield in some sort of time stasis where he is 18 forever? Sampo and Cole were drafted a year apart, Cole is also 20 going on 21 this year, so your math is bad.
Caufield is clearly a higher level of talent, but you seem to be dismissing Ranta without actually knowing anything about Ranta. This seems like a situation where you just looked at where they got drafted and made an assumption.
So a guy that’s 20 that is second in the NCAA in goals is somehow just some trash prospect? What’s trash is the way Montreal played last night getting demolished by Buffalo.One of them was 18, the other one 20
I'll let you guess which ones which
Habs Aren't trading a top5 prospect in the world and another prob around top30 for Byram and a guy who can't even crack the top100 prospect
I would have think long and hard.... on both sides.HABS : Caufield
for
AVS : Bowen
Avs don’t need Chariot. He’s worse than our entire top six where number 6 is Ryan Murray. Erik Johnson is number 5. Both are better players than Chariot.I would have think long and hard.... on both sides.
5 seconds passed... Yes for Mtl
Even better do you want Chariot for picks... 2nd and 4th?
Lol oh boyOf course you would.
That's like saying "if we're trading Suzuki, I'd rather trade for MacKinnon."
Just kind of silly to even bring that up. Of course there's zero chance of that.
No one is sending you a 20 year old, defensively physical, great skating, puck moving, top pair LHD. That’s something you’ll need to draft. Or sign for $9.75mm AAV x 8 when that type of player is a 29 year old UFA.Habs Aren't trading a top5 prospect in the world and another prob around top30 for Byram and a guy who can't even crack the top100 prospect
Or wait till the VAs are cap strapped in the very near future and then offersheet one of them.No one is sending you a 20 year old, defensively physical, great skating, puck moving, top pair LHD. That’s something you’ll need to draft. Or sign for $9.75mm AAV x 8 when that type of player is a 29 year old UFA.
Habs playing with OS? Didn’t learn your lesson yet huh. Not that Montreal has the cap space anyway but MB has a clear target on his back with the offer sheet.Or wait till the VAs are cap strapped in the very near future and then offersheet one of them.
Lot's of options. Sending t2 X top30 prospects in the NHL for a B- prospect and a very good d-man isn't the way.
Or wait till the VAs are cap strapped in the very near future and then offersheet one of them.
Lot's of options. Sending t2 X top30 prospects in the NHL for a B- prospect and a very good d-man isn't the way.
IMO Mtl would jump on this like a Fat kid on a candy. Trading an undersized scoring winger for a top 4 d-man who might be a number 2 is how you win cups.Caufield is a potential solution to our #2 winger for the next decade.
Byram is a potential solution to be our #2 defenseman for next decade.
I'll happily keep Byram, but neither teams would do this.